Page 432 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 432

9. VELOCITY ANALYSIS                            423

           • Frequency of the seismic signal                            ρ ¼ 0:23V 0:25         (9.1)
                                                                                P
           • Anisotropy and fractures
           • Clay content                               where V P and ρ are P wave velocity and bulk
           • Consolidation                              density, respectively.
                                                           Shapes and sizes of the grains also affect the
              The influences of these factors on seismic  velocity in sedimentary rocks. For instance, seis-
           velocities and attenuation of P and S waves in  mic velocity decreases in the case of poor grain
           sedimentary rocks are the major exploration field  contact, while cementation results in a signifi-
           of rock physics research (King, 2005). The seismic  cant increase in the velocity. Shape of the pores
           velocity of the subsurface layers is not constant  also influences the seismic velocity, and the
           for most cases and varies along both time and  rocks with flat pores are of lower velocities
           space directions, even within a specific medium.  Wang (2001). Effects of anisotropy are more pro-
           This is because the local variations in several fac-  nounced for the shales, which are generally con-
           tors, including compaction, overburden pres-  sidered as cap rocks for the reservoirs.
           sure, cementation, saturation, etc., play an  Sometimes fracturing causes anisotropic effects,
           important role in the velocity of a subsurface  especially on the P wave velocity.
           layer. Wang (2001) suggests that dolomite has   V P does change with the porosity and fluid sat-
           the highest P wave velocity in reservoir rocks, fol-  uration of the sedimentary rocks. Increasing
           lowed by limestone and sandstone, while the S  porosity decreases the seismic velocities; how-
           wave velocity decreases, with a possible order  ever, the V P /V S ratio is not strongly affected by
           of sandstone, dolomite and limestone. Because  porosity  change.  As  the  fluid  saturation
           S wave velocity is normally not sensitive to the  increases, P wave velocity slightly decreases first,
           change of fluids in the pore spaces, while P wave  then starts to increase sharply, while S wave
           velocities are strongly affected by fluid type and  velocity decreases, which ultimately causes an
           saturation, P to S wave velocity (V P /V S ) ratio var-  increase in the V P /V S ratio. Incorporating gas
           iations may also provide valuable information for  into the saturated liquid, however, V P signifi-
           lithology discrimination, which is particularly  cantly decreases while V S slightly increases,
           important in amplitude vs. offset (AVO) analysis.  resulting in a lower V P /V S ratio. Increasing the
           For instance, shales are of higher V P /V S ratios  viscosity and density of the pore fluids increases
           than sands within a reservoir. The V P /V S ratio  the velocity of the saturated rock.
           is also sensitive to pore fluids and is lower in  In addition, velocity increases with increasing
           the case of gas saturation.                  depth (or overburden pressure), thus the seismic
              Although the most important factor control-  velocities are generally higher for deeper reflec-
           ling the rock velocity is lithology, experimental  tions on the seismic data because the pores of the
           studies indicate that the other factors listed here  rocks are closed as the overburden pressure
           also strongly affect the velocity distribution  increases. This increase in the velocity is much
           through the subsurface in 3D. Fig. 9.1B summa-  more pronounced for shallow sediments since
           rizes these effects in schematic illustrations.  the number of pore spaces to close progressively
           There are a number of empirical relationships  decreases towards the deeper sediments; thus,
           between bulk density and rock velocity, which  increasing pressure does not excessively influ-
           suggest that the seismic velocity increases with  ence  the  velocity  in  deeper  sediments
           increasing bulk density, although it is not neces-  (Fig.9.1B). Depth or pressure also results in com-
           sary for velocity to increase with the bulk den-  paction of the rocks, causing higher seismic
           sity of the rocks. The most common one is    velocities because of the better contact among
           known as Gardner’s equation, given by        the grains. An older rock has a higher velocity
   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437