Page 81 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 81

72                            2. MARINE SEISMIC DATA ACQUISITION

























           FIG. 2.29  Schematic illustration of four different signals (top) received from a single shot and their ray paths (bottom). (A)
           A single reflection with no ghost, (B) reflection signal plus source ghost, (C) reflection signal plus receiver ghost, and (D) reflec-
           tion signal plus receiver ghost plus source ghost, that is what actually samples the subsurface. When source and ghost notches
           are incorporated, the recorded reflection signal becomes a Ricker wavelet.


              (Fig. 2.29D). This is what we record as a single  sometimes signature deconvolution is applied
              reflection signal in conjunction with both  to the data to convert the source signature into
              source and receiver ghost interferences. This  its zero phase equivalent (dephasing) or to
              signal actually samples the earth.        remove the source signature from the data (des-
                                                        ignature) as an early step in wavelet processing
              Fig.2.30showsthissituationonafar-fieldsignal
                     3
           of a 3190 in air gun array. In practice, streamers  (Section 6.8) for a possible preconditioning of the
                                                        data for subsequent predictive deconvolution.
           aretowed deeper than thesourcearrays, andthe
                                                        However, it is normally not possible to obtain
           far-field signatures become much more compli-
                                                        the entire signature (including the bubbles) for
           cated when we incorporate the receiver ghost:
                                                        every shot to use with the deterministic decon-
           The source signature becomes a Ricker wavelet
                                                        volution. Furthermore, a regular recording of
           with a large negative peak between two relatively
                                                        the far-field signatures is impossible, which
           small positive peaks, as is the case in Fig. 2.29D.
                                                        leads us to use conventional predictive deconvo-
           Another notch appears in the amplitude spectrum
                                                        lution to suppress the residual bubble effects in
           of the far-field signal in addition to the source
                                                        later processing steps (Larner et al., 1982).
           ghost. For the example spectrum in Fig. 2.30D,
           there are two receiver (R 1 and R 2 )and twosource
           (S 1 and S 2 ) ghost notches in the amplitude spec-  2.2.5 Cluster/String/Array
           trum. Receiver ghost notches arise at 107.5 and
           215 Hz, while the source notches appear at 125  In conventional marine seismic operations,
           and 250 Hz, depending on their tow depths of 7  air gun arrays are used as seismic sources, where
           and 6 m, respectively.                       several air guns with different volumes are fired
              In order to remove the residual bubble ampli-  simultaneously. The amplitude produced by
           tudes and the interference of ghost reflections,  an air gun array depends on the number of
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86