Page 60 - Adsorbents fundamentals and applications
P. 60

SIMPLE CRITERIA FOR SORBENT SELECTION  45

            Table 3.3. PSA simulation operating conditions, performance results, and parameter
                                                +
            S for the comparison of LiX (Al/Si = 1, 100% Li -exchange) vs. NaX adsorbents for air
            separation (P H = 1.0 atm, average product purity = 95.5%, average product throughput =
            2.7 × 10 −2  kg O 2 /h/kg sorbent)
                                          +
            (A) LiX or LiLSX (Si/Al = 1, 100% Li ) adsorbent
              Pressure Ratio  Purge-to-Feed  P CD    O 2 Product     Sorbent
                                 Ratio       (atm)    Recovery      Selection
                 P H /P L
                                  P/F                   (%)       Parameter, S
                    2            0.44        0.80       53.5         201.7
                    3            0.23        0.70       61.9         220.9
                    4            0.13        0.70       63.3         232.0
                    5            0.09        0.70       64.1         239.3
                    6            0.06        0.65       65.3         244.4
                    7            0.04        0.65       65.3         248.1
                    8            0.03        0.65       64.5         251.0
                   10            0.02        0.65       64.7         255.2
            (B) NaX (13X) adsorbent
              Pressure Ratio  Purge-to-Feed  P CD    O 2 Product     Sorbent
                 P H /P L        Ratio       (atm)    Recovery      Selection
                                  P/F                   (%)       Parameter, S
                    2            0.80        0.85       20.0         110.40
                    3            0.49        0.80       42.3         118.29
                    4            0.46        0.70       53.3         122.82
                    5            0.35        0.70       53.4         125.77
                    6            0.27        0.70       53.2         127.83
                    7            0.21        0.70       52.8         129.36
                    8            0.18        0.67       52.8         130.54
                   10            0.14        0.67       53.1         132.24
            From Rege and Yang, 2001.


            Although the two sorbents have a subtle difference in performance, the better
            one involving the LiAgX sorbent is reflected accurately by the parameter. In both
            cases S was higher for LiAgX compared with LiLSX under the said operating
            pressures. Thus the sorbent selection parameter is shown to be sensitive to even
            slight differences in the adsorption isotherms.
              The S parameter has been defined for Langmuir systems, that is, the isotherms
            for both components are Langmuirian. For non-Langmuirian systems, α 12 proba-
            bly should be replaced by α 2  /α des , as given by the AFM, because this ratio was
                                   ads
            empirically determined. It seems that the α during the adsorption step is more
            important than during the desorption step in determining the PSA performance.
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65