Page 72 - Adsorption Technology & Design, Elsevier (1998)
P. 72

Rates of adsorption of gases and vapours by porous media  69


            front (upstream) face and the back (downstream) surface of a particle due to
            differing flow conditions which prevail at these positions. However, average
            values, known as average film coefficients, are used in practice. Correlations
            exist for the estimation of these coefficients as functions of fluid properties
            and particle size.
              Wakao and Funazkri (1978) revealed that when mass transfer coefficients
            were  measured  by  experiments  involving  adsorption  or  evaporation,  the
            mass balance for the bed (see Chapter 6) should include a term accounting
            for axial dispersion.  Previous correlations of experimental data were based
            upon a mass balance equation for the packed bed ignoring axial dispersion.
            It was shown that the mass transfer coefficient could be expressed in terms of
            the dimensionless Sherwood number (Sh) by the relation
              Sh = kdp/D = 2.0 + 1.1 Sc 0'33 Re  ~                      (4.4)

            if axial dispersion were included in the analysis of experimental results and
            that  the  value  of  k  was  about  twice  that  for  a  value  of  Re  =  10  if  axial
            dispersion  were  neglected.  The  dimensionless  Reynolds  number,  Re,  in
            equation  (4.4)  is  defined  as  pudp/p  (where  p  is  the  fluid  density,  u  the
            superficial fluid velocity,/z  the fluid viscosity and dp the particle diameter)
            while the dimensionless Schmidt number, Sc, is defined as lt/pD (where D is
            the  diffusion  coefficient  for  bulk  Maxwellian  transport  of the  component
            being  transported  from  fluid  to  solid).  Should  one  have  to  rely  on
            experimental  data  obtained  which  excludes  any  consideration  of  axial
            dispersion,  then it is best to estimate the mass transfer coefficient from the
            use of the so-called j factor, which for mass transfer is
              jD = (kp/p) Sc ~  =  (0.458/e) (Re) ~
                                                                        (4.5)
            and where e is the bed voidage.
              Alternatively the Ranz and Marshall (1952) correlation,
              Sh  "- 2.0  q- 0.6 Sc 0"33 Re  ~                          (4.6)
            may be used when axial dispersion is not included in the bed mass balance.
              The heat transfer coefficient h from solid to fluid may be estimated from a
            correlation for the Nusselt number, Nu, suggested by Lemcoff et al. (1990)
            and  which  is  similar  to  the  correlation  given  by  equation  (4.4)  for  mass
            transfer,
              Nu =  hdp/A,f  =  2.0 + 1.1 er  0'33 Re ~
                                                                        (4.7)
            The dimensionless Prandtl number Pr is defined as cf/~/Af, cf being the heat
            capacity  of  the  fluid  and  Zf  the  corresponding  thermal  conductivity.  At
            moderate and higher values of the Reynolds number the correlation appears
            to be good but at low values of Re a significant scatter of data is evident. The
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77