Page 75 - Adsorption Technology & Design, Elsevier (1998)
P. 75

72  Rates of adsorption of gases and vapours by porous media


            Equations  (4.9),  (4.10)  and  (4.11)  give  the  values  of  the  Maxwellian  (or
            bulk),  Knudsen  and  resultant  diffusion  coefficients,  respectively,  for
            unconstrained  transport  in  a  single  straight  cylindrical  pore.  However,  a
            gaseous  component  diffusing  to  the  interior  of  a  porous  material  travels
            tortuous  pathways  and  is  impeded  by  the  volume  fraction  of  solid
            unavailable for diffusion so that the resultant flux would be less than would
            otherwise  be  calculated  by  the  above  equations.  Accordingly  an  effective
            diffusivity  De  represents  the  net  reduced  diffusion  coefficient  in  a  porous
            medium.  It  may  be  estimated  by  one  of  several  methods.  Experimental
            methods  (outlined in Section 4.3) are the most reliable way of obtaining the
            effective  diffusivity  although  an  empirical  method  of  estimation  is  often
            used.  If  ep  is  the  intrapellet  void  fraction  and  r  a  factor  (termed  the
            tortuosity)  accounting  for  the  tortuous  nature  of  the  pores  (diffusing
            molecules  have  to  travel  longer  distances  than  if the  pores  were  straight)
            then one may write
              De =  ~,p D/r                                            (4.12)
            Because  ep <  1 and r  >  I  then De < D  always. For most porous materials of
            known particle porosity, the value of r  lies within the range 1.5 to 10. In the
            field  of catalysis,  many  related  practical  catalysts  have  a  tortuosity  factor
            between 1.8 and 3. Satterfield (1970) has outlined the method of obtaining r.
            The effective diffusion coefficient De is found by an appropriate experimen-
            tal method (see Section 4.3) for particles of known porosity and the resultant
            diffusivity, D, calculated from a knowledge of pore size distribution  data.
            can then be calculated directly from equation (4.12). Figure 4.1 shows a plot
            of the ratio  of the measured  effective diffusivity to the calculated resultant
            diffusivity, DJD,  as a function of measured porosity ep. Most of the points
            correlate with a line of slope 1.5 when a logarithmic scale is used for ordinate
            and abscissa. Yang and Liu (1982) conclude that r is also a function of t~p and
            show that for most porous structures De/D is approximately equal to/~pE/'t'.
              The random pore model of Wakao and Smith (1962) for a bidisperse pore
            structure may also be applied in order to estimate De. It was supposed that
            the porous solid is composed of stacked layers of microporous particles with
            voids  between  the  particles  forming  a  macroporous  network.  The
            magnitude  of  the  micropores  and  macropores  becomes  evident  from  an
            experimental  pore  size  distribution  analysis.  If  Dm  and  Du  are  the
            macropore  and micropore  diffusivities calculated from equations  (4.9)  and
            (4.10), respectively, the random pore model gives the effective diffusivity as
               De =  •m 2 Dm +  e/a 2  (1 + 3em) DJ(1 -  em)            (4.13)
            where/~m and eu are the macro and micro void fractions, respectively.
              Many  adsorbents  have  a  broad  distribution  of  pore  sizes  and  neither
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80