Page 57 - Advanced Design Examples of Seismic Retrofit of Structures
P. 57

Example of a Two-Story Unreinforced Masonry Building Chapter  2 49


             In Stiffness (Soft Story)
             The stiffness of the seismic-force-resisting system in any story shall not be
             <70% of the seismic-force-resisting system stiffness in an adjacent story above
             or <80% of the average seismic-force-resisting system stiffness of the three
             stories above [2, 10]. According to Section 5.4.2.2 of ASCE 41-13, for checking
             the soft story irregularity, an analysis shall be performed in accordance with
             Section 5.2.4 using the linear dynamic procedure. The adequacy of all elements
             of the seismic-force-resisting system shall be evaluated in the noncompliant
             stories in accordance with Section 5.2.5 of that document. Based on stories’
             total stiffness presented in Table 2.5, the building under study is regular.

             2.6 DEMAND-TO-CAPACITY PARAMETERS

             In this part, the important parameters that affect the seismic demands and the
             building capacity are studied in detail. In design code methodologies, capacity
             refers to the permissible strength or deformation for a component action, and
             demand is the amount of force or deformation imposed on an element or com-
             ponent [2]. Although the example building is an existing school building with
             known behavioral parameters and site conditions, it is intended to study the
             effects of each of these parameters and conditions of the vulnerability of
             masonry buildings. In response to this need, the more important behavioral
             parameters and site conditions are considered as variables which lead to several
             cases. The results of these cases are then compared to each other, which even-
             tually leads to a better understanding of the sensitivity of seismic vulnerability
             of the considered building to each of these parameters. As previously men-
             tioned, the more important parameters related to vulnerability assessment of
             the example building are considered below. There are several parameters which
             play significant roles in determination of a building’s seismic vulnerability.
             These parameters, however, can hardly be determined in practice; as a result,
             they are assumed to be typical fixed quantities. For example, the compressive
             strength of masonry prism is important because this parameter is directly related
             to the toe-crushing capacity and also the modulus of elasticity of masonry.
             However, this parameter is not very feasible to determine for the existing build-
             ings because it necessitates extracting several standard specimens from the wall
             by cutting through them and then testing in the laboratory. Another solution is to
             perform double flat jack testing, which is usually practiced for historical build-
             ings but is rarely practiced for ordinary masonry buildings, especially on a large
             scale as in the case of tens of thousands of Iranian masonry school buildings.


             2.6.1 Mortar Shear Strength
             Shear-bond strength of mortar is a very important parameter for masonry build-
             ings, especially those experiencing shear-sliding failure. As indicated by
             Yekrangnia et al. [11], the majority of Iranian masonry buildings experience
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62