Page 655 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 655

It is believed that two significant hyperconjugative effects result from complexation  637
          with a Lewis acid. The donor effect of alkyl substituents is enhanced by the greater
          electrophilicity of the carbonyl oxygen. There is also believed to be an interaction of  SECTION 7.1
                                                      ∗
          the remaining unshared oxygen electrons with the   orbital of the B−F bond. The  Reactivity of Carbonyl
                                                                                       Compounds toward
                                                  ∗
          interaction lowers the energy of both the 	 and 	 orbitals and enhances the reactivity  Addition
          toward nucleophiles, as indicated in Figure 7.2. 8
                            H    H
                               C               CH3       :
                            H    C  O +             C  O +   F
                               H       B F3      H        B –
                                        –
                                                            F
                                                          F
              Several factors, then, are important in assessing relative reactivity of carbonyl
          compounds. Electronegative substituents enhance reactivity by a polar effect, but if
          they are also 	 donors, there is a resonance effect in the opposite direction. Alkyl and
          aryl substituents decrease reactivity relative to hydrogen by a combination of steric
          and electronic effects. Protonation or complexation with a Lewis acid at the carbonyl
          oxygen enhances reactivity.







                                                 CH 3

                                    CH 3         H
                               π ∗
                                co
                                             BF     ( + 0.76ev)
                                               3
                                     H
                                        ( – 1.59ev)




                                              CH 3

                                                 H
                                    CH 3          ( – 13.36ev)
                                π co
                                     H     BF
                                             3
                                       ( – 15.15ev)
                               Fig. 7.2. Effect of BF 3 complexation of
                               HOMO and LUMO in acetaldehyde. From
                               MNDO calculations, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 108,
                               2405 (1986).

           8
             K. N. Houk and R. W. Strozier, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 95, 4094 (1973).
   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660