Page 65 - Advanced Thermodynamics for Engineers, Second Edition
P. 65

50     CHAPTER 3 ENGINE CYCLES AND THEIR EFFICIENCIES




                                    k
                                   b   1
                                           > 1;  for a diesel ðconstant pressureÞ cycle:  (3.25)
                             C ¼
                                  kðb   1Þ
                Hence, for a given compression ratio (r) the thermal efficiencies are related by
                                                                                          (3.26)
                                                               th diesel
                                                  th dual comb
                                         th Otto
                                       ðh Þ   > ðh Þ       > ðh Þ
                However, the situation changes if the maximum pressure is limited: in fact, if all three cycles are
             compared for the same peak pressure and same work output, then
                                                                                          (3.27)
                                         th diesel  th dual comb  th Otto
                                       ðh Þ    > ðh Þ       > ðh Þ
                Why is this the case? Considering first the cycles with the same compression ratio, then it is
             apparent that the average expansion ratio of each of the cycles is different. The average expansion ratio
             of the Otto cycle is equal to the compression ratio, r.In Fig. 3.15, V e represents a typical cycle and the
             typical expansion ratio r e ¼ V 1 =V e and, since V e > V 2 , then r e < r. So if there is any constant pressure
             combustion then there must be a lower mean expansion ratio than in the case of the Otto cycle.
                Figure 3.16 shows a comparison of two cycles (an Otto and a Diesel cycle). These have the same
             peak pressure and the same work output. It can be seen that the compression ratio of the diesel engine is
             higher than that of the Otto cycle engine: in fact, the expansion ratio of the Diesel cycle throughout the
             cycle is higher than the compression ratio of the Otto cycle. This means that the thermal efficiency of
             each element of the Diesel cycle is more efficient than the Otto cycle, and hence this Diesel cycle is
             more efficient than the Otto cycle. A similar argument applies for the dual-combustion cycle, which
             lies between the Diesel and Otto cycles.
                These idealised cycles enable general concepts to be understood. They have enabled us to see why a
             Diesel engine cycle can be more efficient than an Otto one if the peak pressure is limited. They have
             shown that expansion ratio is a more relevant parameter than compression ratio when considering the
             efficiency of a cycle. However, they have not allowed us to see how the performance of real engines,
             with finite rates of combustion, varies when parameters are changed. These are considered in



                                                 Maximum pressure
                                       Pressure, p













                                                              Volume, V
             FIGURE 3.16
             Comparison of Otto and Diesel cycles with the same maximum pressure and work outputs.
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70