Page 139 - Advances In Productive, Safe, and Responsible Coal Mining
P. 139

Communication and tracking system performance                     123

           distance. This metric is only descriptive within the active TCA because it derives from
           a set of IAs.
              The 90% CD describes the 90th percentile of IA values from a GTP, an IA mea-
           surement in which there is a very high (90%) confidence that a subsequent IA calcu-
           lation will be within the 90% CD. The calculation is done by ranking IA measurements
           and the IA that is at the 90th percentile rank is the value. This metric value is the clos-
           est match to the regulatory guidelines of accuracy required in various parts of the
           mine. The important difference is that this is a confidence that a value will be within
           the limit; it is not a set measurement. For instance, an IA value at 105ft, in an area
           where the 90% CD is 100ft, is not an indication that the 90% CD of that area is in
           fact larger than 100ft. A set of measurements that show a 90% CD greater than
           100ft is an indication that the 90% CD should be increased for that area.
              Values for AA, SDA, and 90% CD as calculated for a particular system/section are
           one-dimensional representations of the accuracy of the tracking system. It may also be
           important to describe the relative skew in the TSP in two dimensions because tracking
           systems report coordinates for a tracked device. The analogy of IA in two-dimensional
           space is the error vector (EV), which is the simple difference vector between Cartesian X
           and Y components of GTP and TSP. Average error vector (AEV) is the average displace-
           ment of a set of TSPs from their corresponding GTP. Average cluster radius (ACR) is
           the average of distances a set of TSPs are from their center point, which is determined by
           the average error vector. These values are determined by moving each GTP to the origin
           and then average TSPs to their corresponding relative locations. The resulting graphs
           show bias and spread in the tracking system, which are described by AEV and ACR.
           For a set of Ν TSP measurements in the active TCA and corresponding GTPs, AEV
           is the vector representing average X and Y coordinates of EVs associated with the
           set. ACR is the average of the distance of a TSP from the AEV. It describes a circular
           area around the AEV in which the average TSP value would be located.


                            h
               h EV x0 ,EV y0 ¼ TSP x0  GTP x0 , TSP y0  GTP y0
                              Ν       Ν
                             X       X
                            *    EV xi  EV yi +
                              i¼1    i¼1
             h AEV x ,AEV y ¼       ,
                                Ν       Ν
                                   ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
                                 q
                            X  N                2                2
                    ACR ¼          ð TSP xi  AEV x Þ + TSP yi  AEV y  =N
                               i¼1
           Other important metrics such as reliability, availability, and relative accuracy are dis-
           cussed elsewhere.


           8.3   Simulation of tracking system performance


           Prior to installation and testing of the communications and tracking system, computer
           simulations were used to generate anticipated results. These predictions were then
           used as the baseline for the system being tested, a partial mesh system with several
   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144