Page 43 - Advances in Biomechanics and Tissue Regeneration
P. 43

3.2 IDEAL MECHANICAL PROPERTIES FOR COLONIC STENTS                   37

           • Radial compression resistance (Fig. 3.2C): Stiffness of the stent when compressed by uniformly distributed radial
              pressure. A higher value is better. In the case of use materials that present hysteresis loops in their strain-stress curve
              (e.g., Nitinol), two parameters related to compression and expansion are defined. In such a case, the radial
              compression resistance is controlled by two terms. The first is the radial compression resistance (RCR): stiffness of
              the stent when compressed by uniformly distributed radial pressure (crimping process). A higher value is better.
              The second is the chronic radial expansion force (CEF): radial force exerted by the stent against the duct wall in
              deployment (release process). A higher and progressive (low slope) value evolution is better.
           • Buckling resistance (Fig. 3.2D): Stent resistance to inelastic collapse when compressed by pressure above a critical
              value. A higher value is better.
           • Longitudinal flexibility (Fig. 3.2E): Flexibility of the stent when globally bent as a tubular beam. A higher value
              (lower stiffness) is better.
           • Perimetral adaptability (Fig. 3.2F): Ability to tightly adapt to the shape of the conduit cross- section for whose
              patency the device is maintained. A higher value is better.
           • Longitudinal adaptability (Fig. 3.2G): Ability to tightly adapt to the shape of the conduit longitudinal section for
              whose patency the device is maintained. A higher value is better.
           • Mesh opening: Total amount of conduit tissue area not covered by metal on each of the deformed cells of the
              expanded stent. A lower value is better.
           • Migration tendency: Probability of stent displacement after correct implantation due to peristaltic movement in
              combination with poor mechanical performance. A lower value is better.


           3.2.2 Commercial Stents

           3.2.2.1 Self-Expanding Stainless Steel Stents
           3.2.2.1.1 WALLSTENT (FIG. 3.3)
              This stent is based on braided wires in a tubular configuration with two families of helicoidal springs rolled up in
           inverse directions. There is no connection between the wires in the helicoidal shape, which results in the formation of










































           FIG. 3.3  Wallstent: (A) geometrical scheme; (B) real view. (Source: Boston Scientific.)

                                                       I. BIOMECHANICS
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48