Page 45 - Advances in Eco-Fuels for a Sustainable Environment
P. 45

22                               Advances in Eco-Fuels for a Sustainable Environment


          Table 2.5 Carbohydrate content of different algal species [15]

          Microalgal species                 Total carbohydrates (% per dry weight)
          Arthrospira platensis              40.8
          Nannochloropsis sp.                56.8
          Dunaliella tertiolecta             50.6
          Dunaliella salina Teod             69.7
          Galdileria partita Sentz           50.1
          Cosmarium sp.                      58.4
          Nostoc sp.                         52.3
          Chlorella vulgaris IAMC-534        37.0 (starch)
          C. vulgaris CCAP 211/11B           55.0
          C. vulgaris P12                    41.0 (starch)
          C. vulgaris FSP-E                  55.0 (starch)
          Chlamydomonas reinhardtii UTEX 90  60.0
          C. reinhardtii IAM C-238           55.0 (starch)
          Chlorococcum humicola              32.5
          Chlorococcum sp. TISTR 8583        26.0 (starch)
          S. acutiformis TISTR 8495          16.4 (starch)
          S. obliquus CNW-N                  51.8
          Tetraselmis sp. CS-362             26.0


            Another favorable property of this feedstock is the diversity of growth possibilities,
         including:
            Open ponds, in which algae are grown within a pond at the open air. These are simple and
         -
            low-cost, but less efficient than others. Furthermore, external organisms could contaminate
            the pond and potentially damage or kill the algae.
            Closed-loop systems, similar to open ponds, but not exposed to the atmosphere and using a
         -
            CO 2 source before ever released into the atmosphere.
            Photobioreactors, the most advanced and most difficult systems to implement, with high
         -
            capital costs but maximum advantages in terms of process yield and control.
         These systems imply that algae could be grown almost anywhere, if ambient temper-
         atures are warm enough, and that no farmland need be converted. Furthermore, algae
         can be grown in wastewater, with secondary benefits as they can help treat municipal
         sewage without taking up additional land. All these factors make algae easier to cul-
         tivate than any other traditional biofuel crop [14].
            Algae have only one major downside in that they require large amounts of water
         and nutrients (N and P) to grow. Even though closed-loop and photobioreactor sys-
         tems have been used in arid and desert settings, algae need huge amounts of water.
         Their nutrient needs are such that the alternative production of fertilizers to meet them
         would produce more GHG emissions than those that would be saved using algal-based
         biofuel. Industrial N production needs, in fact, 19.3kWh/kg N produced by the Haber-
         Bosch process, and P production from phosphate rock requires 2.11kWh/kg P. While
         this is not an issue if the alternative is nutrient removal from wastewater, which actu-
         ally causes additional GHG emissions, it could be such if the foreseen alternative is
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50