Page 162 - Advances in Forensic Applications of Mass Spectrometry - Jehuda Yinon
P. 162

1522_C03.fm  Page 145  Thursday, November 13, 2003  9:53 AM









                             any racial bias in hair testing? (5) What is the influence of cosmetic treat-
                                                                      28
                             ments? Several answers were recently provided  on these specific topics.
                                It is always possible to obtain a fresh identical hair sample if there is any
                             claim of a specimen mix-up or breach in the chain of custody. This makes
                             hair analysis essentially fail-safe, in contrast to urine analysis, since an iden-
                             tical urine specimen cannot be obtained at a later date. Clearly, hair analysis
                             can thus function as a “safety net” for urine analysis.
                                Unfortunately, according to the International Olympic Committee
                             (IOC), basic scientific knowledge in hair biology is still lacking to make scalp
                             hair analysis now a valid specimen in the field of doping control and the
                             following points should be resolved before applications: (1) analytical meth-
                             ods are missing for several doping compounds, such as diuretics, (2) peptide
                             hormones are not extractable, (3) hair washing, discoloring, tinting, and
                             hair color (resulting in potential ethnic discrimination) appear to influence
                             the concentration of drug measured in hair, and (4) drug incorporation
                             within the hair longitudinal axis and upon time is not proved to be regular
                             on all occasions.



                             3.5 Conclusions

                             It appears that the value of hair analysis for the identification of drug users
                             is steadily gaining recognition. This can be seen from its growing use in
                             preemployment screening, in forensic sciences, and in clinical applications.
                             Hair analysis may be a useful adjunct to conventional drug testing in doping
                             control. Specimens can be more easily obtained with less embarrassment,
                             and hair can provide a more accurate history of drug use.
                                Although there are still controversies on how to interpret the results,
                             particularly concerning external contamination, cosmetic treatments, ethnic
                             bias, or drug incorporation, pure analytical work in hair analysis has reached
                             a sort of plateau, having solved almost all the analytical problems.
                                Though GC/MS is the method of choice in practice, GC/MS/MS or
                             LC/MS are today used in several laboratories, even for routine cases, partic-
                             ularly to target low dosage compounds like corticoids.
                                In  the case of doping control, drugs are screened in urine specimens
                             according to validated standard operating procedures in accredited labora-
                             tories. As forensic laboratories can be involved in testimony dealing with
                             doping agents, the idea of using hair for doping control has emerged as hair
                             analysis has been accepted in court in other cases. Courts can request addi-
                             tional information on the pattern of use of doping substances, such as during
                             the 1998 cycling Tour de France where blood, urine, and hair were simulta-
                             neously collected. Hair can both confirm repetitive abuse and identify the


                             © 2004 by CRC Press LLC
   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167