Page 267 - Air Pollution Control Engineering
P. 267

05_chap_wang.qxd  05/05/2004  3:46 pm  Page 246
                    246                                                    Lawrence K. Wang et al.

                             D =                ft /lb
                                                  3
                              w
                                                                 3
                          where D = D is the density of emission (lb/ft ), P is the pressure of the emission
                                     w
                          stream (1 atm), M is the molecular weight of the specific pollutant gas (18 lb/lb-mol),
                                                       3
                          R is the gas constant (0.7302 atm-ft /lb-mol °R), and T = T  is the temperature of the
                                                                         e,s
                          gas (°R).
                          Substituting into Eq. (29) yields
                             Q =                 cfm
                              w
                          The saturated emission stream flow rate is determined by substituting into Eq. (29):
                             Q  =                 acfm
                              e,s
                       G. Permit Application for Submission
                          The results of this exercise, with supporting data, are summarized in the following
                          table. Note P (estimated pressure drop) versus the observed pressure drop for this
                                     v
                          Venturi scrubber. When estimated and reported results differ significantly, such dis-
                          crepancies may be the result of the following:
                             1.  Use of an incorrect performance curve
                             2.  Disagreement between required and observed removal efficiencies
                          This will necessitate a discussion of system details (design and operational proce-
                          dures) with the applicant. If the estimated and operational pressure losses are in
                          agreement, one may assume that both design and operation of the Venturi scrubber are
                          satisfactory based on the assumptions used in this handbook.

                                                            Calculated value     Observed value
                          Particle mean diameter, D
                                               p
                          Collection efficiency, CE
                          Pressure drop across venture, P
                                                    v
                    Example 14
                       This example uses an instance in which a municipal incinerator is conducting an investigation
                       evaluating the usefulness of the Venturi scrubber (see Fig. 1c) to solve an air pollution con-
                       trol issue. The Venturi is one of several possible methods that could be used to treat this
                       air emission stream (see Table 15). Using the Calculation Sheet for Venturi Scrubbers from
                       Example 13, this study will proceed according to the following:
                       A. Gather the pertinent pollutant characterization data.
                       B. Estimate the Venturi scrubber pressure drop.
                       C. Decide the needed fabrication material.
                       D. Determine saturated gas flow rate for Venturi scrubber sizing purposes.
                       E. Consult with the appropriate regulatory authorities (federal, state, and local) how the
                          agency will evaluate the incinerator’s Venturi scrubber permit application.
                       Solution

                       A. HAP Characteristics—needed data:
                          Because a Venturi scrubber is one of the selected control techniques for the theoreti-
                          cal municipal emission stream, the pertinent data for these procedures are taken from
                          the HAP Emission Stream Data Form (Table 15).
   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272