Page 310 - Air Pollution Control Engineering
P. 310

05_chap_wang.qxd  05/05/2004  3:51 pm  Page 289
                    Wet and Dry Scrubbing                                                     289



























                                     Fig. 20. Tray tower and tray types. (From US EPA.)




                          the Venturi remains fixed in these designs. Industry preference to use a single Venturi
                          scrubber to process variable gas flow rates led to designs of Venturi scrubbers with
                          adjustable throat openings. Examples of variable-throat Venturi scrubbers are presented
                          in Fig. 18b–h.
                          Venturi scrubbers typically have a pressure drop of 10 to as high as 30 in. of water.
                          As such, the Venturi scrubber is normally classified as a high-power-consumption
                          unit operation. In addition to having a high energy demand, the choice of the Venturi
                          scrubber is also limited by polluted gas–absorbent (the slurry) contact time within
                          the tower.
                       2.  Typical spray towers are presented in Fig. 19. In the spray tower, the absorbent (slurry)
                          is injected into the polluted gas stream being treated through atomizing nozzles. The
                          slurry is forced into a mist of fine microdroplets by the action of the nozzles. Droplet
                          formation is also supported by the velocity of the gas being treated within the tower.
                          The resultant extremely high surface area of the many droplets provides. for excellent
                          contact between gas and liquid surfaces. In normal operations, slurry droplets are
                          formed with diameters of 50–4000 mm.
                       3.  In addition to promoting excellent gas–liquid contact, a spray tower accomplishes this
                          with minimal pressure loss. This is a result of the fact that the spay tower has no inter-
                          nal components that will impede the upward flow of air as the slurry droplets pass
                          downward through the tower countercurrent to the gas flow, as seen in Fig. 19a. This
                          simple design allows for spray towers to operate with pressure losses in the range of
                          1–4 in. of water.
                          Spray towers are also sometimes designed using a crosscurrent flow scheme as pre-
                          sented in Fig. 19b. This design may be chosen over the countercurrent design as the
                          result of height restrictions or other concerns regarding a vertical tower. As the result
                          of the lower height, the slurry pump size will be reduced somewhat. A cross-flow
                          tower will always require increased spatial area than a vertical tower. The need to have
   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315