Page 464 - Air Pollution Control Engineering
P. 464

11_chap_wang.qxd  05/05/2004  5:19 pm  Page 436
                    436                                  Gregory T. Kleinheinz and Phillip C Wright

                    Table 7
                    Microbial, pH, and Moisture Content Averages During the Pilot Study
                                                 Microbial          pH of solid     Solid-support
                                                   count             support      moisture content
                    July average               1.1 E8 CFU/g            6.2             35% (w/w)
                    August average             2.7 E5 CFU/g            6.6             30%
                    September average          2.9 E6 CFU/g            6.7             28%
                    Take down                  3.4 E6 CFU/g            7.1             31%


                    Table 8
                    Airborne Chemicals Monitored During the Pilot Study
                    Parameter      Overall removal     Influent mean (ppm)     Effluent mean (ppm)
                    VOCs                93.7%             16.33 (±5.39)            0.94 (±5.72)
                    H S                100% a              0.06 (±0.22)            0.00 (±0.00)
                      2
                    Ammonia             81.6%             19.67 (±6.50)            3.61 (±5.14)
                       a Very low concentrations of H S.
                                             2

                    Table 9
                    Estimated and Actual Costs of the Two Air Treatment Systems

                                                   Chemical system               Biofilter
                    Estimated capital cost           $1,224,000                   $941,000
                    Estimated annual O&M               $194,000                    $45,000
                    Actual capital Cost                 n/a                     $1,120,000 a
                    Actual O&M (First year) b           n/a                        $45,000
                       a Includes all engineering, lava rock, and so forth.
                       b Unit has been operating for 1.5 yr.


                       A decision on mode of operating, such as upflow or downflow of the polluted air and
                    method of delivery of liquid/nutrients, would subsequently need to be decided.

                    5.2. General Odor Control at a Municipal Wastewater-Treatment Facility
                       The following is a case study of a successful biofilter application for odor control of
                    a low concentration but chemically diverse airstream. The case study describes the rea-
                    sons for an air treatment system, the cost comparisons for a competing technology, a
                    description of the decision-making process, and outcomes of the process. It should be
                    noted that there are numerous ways to go about choosing your treatment system and this
                    is one of many possible successful routes. However, this example does illustrate the great
                    potential cost savings of biofiltration technology. Additional information is presented in
                    Tables 7–10 and Fig. 4.
                       The Neenah–Menasha Sewerage Commission owns and operates a regional 13 mgd
                    waste-water treatment facility serving a population of 55,000 in northeast Wisconsin.
                    The plant serves the cities of Neenah and Menasha, Waverly Sanitary District, Town of
   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469