Page 42 - Air pollution and greenhouse gases from basic concepts to engineering applications for air emission control
P. 42

1.5 General Approaches to Air Emission Control                  15

              One approach to the lowest emission level is the employment of the best
            technologies currently available to keep the equipment in a good operating con-
            dition. The corresponding regulations (or standards) have to specify the “best
            technology” equipment. Since the best technology currently available allows for the
            lowest emissions currently possible, the corresponding standard does not have to
            specify the emission rate from a facility or equipment installed with such devices.
            This “best technology” approach is a good application where accurate emission
            monitoring is challenging. For example, US state regulations for large underground
            storage tanks (UST) require the operators to install the best floating roofs available
            and the equipment has to be well maintained. Another example is the prohibition of
            manure spread in many local municipalities to minimize the odor dispersion to local
            communities. It is sometimes economically challenging for industry to keep up with
            advances in technology. Replacement of the entire air pollution control system of a
            power plant is not as easy as changing the diesel particulate filter under a truck.
              Another approach to air emission standards does not require an operator to
            install the best technology; it is up to the operator to decide. The regulations set the
            maximum air emission rates for different air pollutants.
              It is simple, but expensive, to implement air emission standards. In these stan-
            dards, permitted emission rates and the standard test procedures are clearly
            described. Any trained professional can follow the standard procedure to determine
            whether the standards are met at a facility. As the best technology approach is
            generally expensive, it may not be always necessary to implement this standard for
            facilities in remote areas with low populations.
              The flexibility of air emission standards is poor. It is impractical to shut down a
            utility plant that supplies electricity or heat to a large community, even if it cannot
            meet the local air emission standard. In this case, it is obvious that air emission
            standards may fail to control air pollution. Compared to air emission standards, air
            quality standards are much more flexible in addressing this political challenge.


            1.5.1.2 Air Quality Standards

            Air quality standards are developed based on extensive scientific study on and
            validation of the threshold values of the air pollutants. Due to the nature of scientific
            research, statistical errors are allowed. One well-known example of air quality
            standards is the US National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), which have
            established limitations on air pollutants considered harmful to public health and the
            environment (with details available at http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html). These
            standards vary with location, time, and sector and they are subject to regular
            reviews and revisions, as needed.
              Not all air pollutants are regulated by air quality standards. The US Clean Air
            Act requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set National Ambient
            Air Quality Standards for six criteria air pollutants:
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47