Page 153 -
P. 153

Chapter 3 ■ Digital Morphology   127


                               were chosen to be the differences between the grey-level at the darkest
                               point of the scan line and that of each of the following eight pixels in each
                               column.











                                                (a)                                 (b)











                                                (c)                                 (d)
                               Figure 3.28: Grey-level smoothing. (a) Disk guard image subjected to Gaussian noise
                               having a standard deviation of 30. (b) Thresholded version of a showing salt and
                               pepper effect of thresholding the noise. (c) Image (a) after morphological smoothing. (d)
                               Smoothed image after thresholding, showing less noise in the thresholded image.




                                               P2
                                               #origin 1 5
                                               3 8 255
                                               0 0 0
                                               2 2 2
                                               7 7 7
                                               12 12 12
                                               14 14 14
                                      (a)      9 9 9              (c)           (d)            (e)
                                               9 9 9
                                           (b)  5 5 5
                               Figure 3.29: Morphological smoothing used to reduced structured noise. (a) Small image
                               section showing scan lines. (b) Structuring element used to reduce the scan lines. (c)
                               Image (a) after smoothing. (d) A second example with scan lines. (e) Image (d) after
                               smoothing with the element in (b).


                                 The result is surprisingly good. Figure 3.29c is the smoothed version of
                               3.29a, and while it is a little blurry the scan line noise has been significantly
                               reduced; the same can be said for Figures 3.29d and 3.29e, which are the before
                               and after versions of another sample taken from the same larger image.
   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158