Page 208 -
P. 208

188   CHAPTER 4 LINEAR PROGRAMMING APPLICATIONS


                                     But with an additional constraint that:


                                                            275:7v 1 þ 348:5v 2 þ 104:1v 3 ¼ 1

                                     The full formulation is then:


                                            Max :

                                            36:72u 1 þ 45:98u 2 þ 175u 3 þ 23u 4
                                            s:t:

                                            275:7v 1 þ 348:5v 2 þ 104:1v 3 þ 1
                                            48:14u 1 þ 43:1u 2 þ 253u 3 þ 41u 4   285:2v 1   123:8v 2   106:72v    0
                                            34:62u 1 þ 27:11u 2 þ 148u 3 þ 27u 4   162:3v 1   128:7v 2   64:21v 3    0

                                            36:72u 1 þ 45:98u 2 þ 175u 3 þ 23u 4   275:7v 1   348:5v 2   104:1v 3    0
                                            33:16u 1 þ 56:46u 2 þ 160u 3 þ 84u 4   210:4v 1   154:1v 2   104:04v 3    0

                                            u 1 ; u 2 ; u 3 ; u 4 ; v 1 ; v 2 ; v 3   0


                                     The LP problem can now be solved in the usual way. Figure 4.12 shows the results.
                                     The objective function takes a value of 0.902. This is the efficiency score for County
                                     hospital. Given that this is less than 1 tells us that County hospital is relatively
                                     inefficient compared to at least one other hospital in the data set. Using the
                                     optimum weights for County hospital, we can calculate the efficiency scores for
                                     the other hospitals:




                                                     General hospital:                   0.99
                                                     University hospital:                1.00
                                                     County hospital:                    0.90
                                                     City hospital                       1.00




                                     In fact we see that all the other hospitals are more efficient than County with
                                     both University and City hospitals having maximum efficiency. This implies that
                    The ‘envelopment’ part
                    of DEA comes from the  County’s efficiency can be improved – more outputs and/or less inputs are
                    fact that the efficient  possible given the performance of the other hospitals. Advanced analysis of the
                    units create an ‘envelope’  DEA results (which is beyond this text) would also enable managers to set
                    or frontier envelope, or  numerical targets in terms of what input/output quantities should be for County.
                    frontier, around the data
                    set.             We could now repeat the analysis for the other three hospitals in the data set to
                                     assess their relative efficiency. For example, we could re-formulate the problem
                                     to look at General hospital. The objective function would now use the numerical
                                     parameters for General hospital from Table 4.17 and the equality constraint
                                     would also use appropriate numerical parameters. Solving the new problem
                                     would give the optimum input/output weights for General hospital and again
                                     its own efficiency score.







                Copyright 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has
                      deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213