Page 288 -
P. 288

268   CHAPTER 6 SIMPLEX-BASED SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND DUALITY


                                     The final tableau for the original HighTech Industries problem is shown here.


                                                         x 1     x 2      s 1       s 2      s 3
                                      Basis      c B     50      40        0        0        0

                                      x 2        40       0       1       0.32      0       0.12        12
                                      s 2         0       0       0       0.32      1        0.12        8
                                      x 1        50       1       0       0.20      0        0.20       30
                                                         50      40       2.80      0        5.20     1 980
                                            z j
                                                          0       0       2.80      0       5.20
                                          c j – z j

                                     The optimal solution to the primal problem is x 1 ¼ 30, x 2 ¼ 12, s 1 ¼ 0, s 2 ¼ 8 and
                                     s 3 ¼ 0. The optimal value of the objective function is 1980.
                                       What observation can we make about the relationship between the optimal value
                                     of the objective function in the primal and the optimal value in the dual for the
                                     HighTech problem? The optimal value of the objective function is the same (1980)
                                     for both. This relationship is true for all primal and dual linear programming
                                     problems and is stated as property 1.
                                        Property 1
                                        If the dual problem has an optimal solution, the primal problem has an
                                        optimal solution and vice versa. Furthermore, the values of the optimal
                                        solutions to the dual and primal problems are equal.
                                     This property tells us that if we solved only the dual problem, we would know that
                                     HighTech could make a maximum of E1980.


                                     Interpretation of the Dual Variables
                                     Before making further observations about the relationship between the primal and
                                     the dual solutions, let us consider the meaning or interpretation of the dual variables
                                     u 1 , u 2 and u 3 . Remember that in setting up the dual problem, each dual variable is
                                     associated with one of the constraints in the primal. Specifically, u 1 is associated with
                                     the assembly time constraint, u 2 with the UltraPortable display constraint and u 3
                                     with the warehouse space constraint.
                                       To understand and interpret these dual variables, let us return to property 1 of
                                     the primal–dual relationship, which stated that the objective function values for the
                                     primal and dual problems must be equal. At the optimal solution, the primal
                                     objective function results in:



                                                                 50x 1 þ 40x 2 ¼ 1980                (6:10)


                                     while the dual objective function is:



                                                             150u 1 þ 20u 2 þ 300u 3 ¼ 1980          (6:11)









                Copyright 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has
                      deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293