Page 101 - An Introduction to Political Communication Second Edition
P. 101

AN INTRODUCTION TO POLITICAL COMMUNICATION

            as Livingstone and Lunt put it, to establish ‘new forms of relationship
            between experts and laity’ (1994, p.131).

                 In the audience discussion programme, experts [politicians
                 in particular] and lay people are put together, setting an
                 agenda of social issues and offering both established elites
                 and ordinary people the opportunity at least to discuss
                 the lived experience of current affairs issues in relation to
                 expert solutions.
                                                           (Ibid.)



                                Broadcast punditry
            Notwithstanding the requirements of impartiality imposed on the
            broadcasters in these and other contexts there are some formats in
            which broadcasting journalists, like their press counterparts, can go
            beyond the mere reporting of politics and move into the role of active
            participants. At the most general level, broadcasting works as part
            of the wider media system to define agendas and ‘political realities’
            at any given time. Television and radio to a large extent follow the
            news agenda set by the press, one set of media feeding and reinforcing
            another’s perceptions of what is important.
              Straight news programmes do not, for the reasons already
            mentioned, stray far beyond the narrow reportage function.
            Mainstream bulletins on BBC1 and ITV, as one would expect, move
            quickly through the day’s events, dealing only briefly with each.
            Moments of definition are included, however, in the form, firstly, of
            special correspondents. Like the political columnists of the press, the
            correspondents are in a sense pundits although, unlike the latter,
            their subjectivity and interpretative work must be confined to
            analysing the situation, as opposed to instructing, and appealing to,
            the audience. Channel 4 News’ Elinor Goodman, for example, will
            frequently be asked by the programme’s presenters to assess or make
            sense of a political event, be it a party leadership crisis or a crucial
            debate in the House of Commons. She will do so from a position of
            authority, based on her track record as an ‘expert’ in broadcasting
            terms, and on the fact that she clearly has access to reliable elite
            sources. In this respect she, and her colleagues like the BBC’s Robin
            Oakley or John Sargent, trade on the same privileged access to elites
            enjoyed by the senior press columnists, and build their status as
            pundits upon that access. Where Hugo Young can say what he thinks

                                       84
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106