Page 99 - An Introduction to Political Communication Second Edition
P. 99

AN INTRODUCTION TO POLITICAL COMMUNICATION

            was accused of plagiarism on air—and consciously sets out to
            undermine their status and credibility. All these ‘bards’, while
            distinct from the conventions of journalism, make an important
            contribution to the public discourse of politics, exploring current
            issues and concerns in a populist style which ‘straight’ broadcast
            news must avoid.
              British broadcasting, as has been described, is bound by strict
            rules of impartiality, which inevitably constrain the extent to which
            journalists can match the strongly opinionated pundits of the press.
            They must be seen and heard to be scrupulously fair, balanced, and
            neutral, at least with regard to constitutional politicians of the
            mainstream party system. We have already noted the oft-made
            criticism of broadcast news for its deviations from the ideal of
            ‘impartiality’, and the suggestion that in reality it contains a deep
            structural bias towards the status quo. Our concern here, however,
            is with the broadcasters’ tendency, and legally imposed responsibility
            in the interests of a strong and healthy democracy, not to take sides
            in political disputes.
              One expression of this impartiality is the broadcasters’ role as
            transmitters of political discourse. The press can report what a
            politician says, but the broadcasters can transmit it live, in colour.
            Despite the controversy which accompanied the first live broadcasts
            of Parliament, on radio and then television, it has now become an
            accepted component of the British political process (Hetherington et
            al., 1990; Franklin, 1992). Live transmission remains, for essentially
            commercial reasons, restricted to Prime Minister’s Question Time
            and special occasions, but has gradually expanded (helped by Sky
            News) into a range of ‘review’ programmes which give the interested
            viewer and listener a more substantial overview of parliamentary
            business.
              In 1992 a consortium of British cable operators set up the
            Parliamentary Channel, a non-profit service transmitting live coverage
            of debates in the houses of Commons and Lords, the proceedings of
            select committees, and sessions of the European parliament. The
            service was taken over by the BBC in August 1998, and renamed
            BBC Parliament. Although as yet watched only by a small number
            of cable subscribers, it can be expected to expand its reach in the
                           5
            digital era ahead.  Through this output the citizen encounters, in a
            uniquely raw and unedited fashion, the process of political debate,
            and may judge the performances of participants accordingly. Of
            course, many of the truly important debates remain hidden from
            public view, but when a government has only a small majority, as

                                       82
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104