Page 104 - An Introduction to Political Communication Third Edition
P. 104

THE MEDIA AS POLITICAL ACTORS

               be confused with journalism, strives to represent the people against
               their leaders – impressionists with a strong political content in their
               materials, such as Rory Bremner and Chris Morris, and comedians
               like  Ben  Elton  who  specialise  in  heavily  politicised  stand-up
               routines. Moving closer to journalism are those interviewers, such
               as  Clive  Anderson,  who  employ  a  chat-show  format,  but  lace  it
               with  an  element  of  satirical  mockery  of  the  powerful,  while
               Mark Thomas’ combination of stand-up comedy and investigative
               journalism has frequently indulged in anti-establishment satire. All
               these ‘bards’, while not subject to the conventions of journalism,
               make an important contribution to the public discourse of politics,
               exploring  current  issues  and  concerns  in  a  populist  style  which
               ‘straight’ broadcast news must avoid.
                 British broadcasting, as has been described, is bound by strict
               rules of impartiality, which inevitably constrain the extent to which
               journalists can match the strongly opinionated pundits of the press.
               They must be seen and heard to be scrupulously fair, balanced and
               neutral,  at  least  with  regard  to  constitutional  politicians  of  the
               mainstream  party  system.  We  have  already  noted  the  oft-made
               criticism  of  broadcast  news  for  its  deviations  from  the  ideal  of
               ‘impartiality’, and the suggestion that in reality it contains a deep
               structural bias towards the status quo. Our concern here, however,
               is with the broadcasters’ tendency, and legally imposed responsi-
               bility in the interests of a strong and healthy democracy, not to take
               sides in political disputes.
                 One expression of this impartiality is the broadcasters’ role as
               transmitters  of  political  discourse.  The  press  can  report  what  a
               politician says, but the broadcasters can transmit it live, in colour.
               Despite the controversy which accompanied the first live broadcasts
               of Parliament, on radio and then television, it has now become an
               accepted component of the British political process (Hetherington
               et  al.,  1990;  Franklin,  1992).  Live  transmission  on  the  main
               channels  remains  restricted  to  Prime  Minister’s  Question  Time
               and  special  occasions,  but  has  gradually  expanded  (helped  by
               Sky  News)  into  a  range  of  ‘review’  programmes  which  give  the
               interested  viewer  and  listener  a  more  substantial  overview  of
               parliamentary business.
                 In  1992  a  consortium  of  British  cable  operators  set  up  the
               Parliamentary  Channel,  a  non-profit  service  transmitting  live
               coverage  of  debates  in  the  Houses  of  Commons  and  Lords,  the
               proceedings  of  select  committees,  and  sessions  of  the  European
               parliament. The service was taken over by the BBC in August 1998


                                          83
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109