Page 170 - An Introduction to Political Communication Third Edition
P. 170

POLITICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS

                 In the wake of the 1983 defeat, not only did Labour transform its
               approach to advertising and public relations in general, it selected
               in  Neil  Kinnock  a  leader  whom  it  was  felt  could  compete  with
               the Conservatives, on the terrain of image as well as policy. Like
               Margaret  Thatcher,  he  permitted  his  dress-sense,  hair-style,  and
               voice to be coached and shaped. His successor, John Smith, was
               equally adept at image-management, although the constituents of
               his image (intelligent, reliable, safe) were different from Kinnock’s
               (passionate,  tough).  Smith’s  successor,  Tony  Blair,  was  elected
               largely because of his perceived ability to look and sound good for
               the cameras, and to communicate, with his image, to the electorally
               crucial voters of southern England. Nick Jones argues that Blair was
               indeed the first UK party leader to have been chosen for his ability
               to say ‘only what he wanted to say and what he believed to be true’
               (1997, p. 9).
                 It may be, of course, that the importance of image is overstated,
               and that audiences have gradually learned to ‘read’ the practices of
               image-management and discount them. Thatcher’s successor John
               Major was widely perceived as ‘lacking’ in image, meaning that his
               style was rather plain and simple. During the 1992 general election
               campaign Major adopted the old-fashioned practice of addressing
               the  public  from  a  ‘soapbox’  erected  outside  his  campaign  bus.
               Notwithstanding the occasional egg or flour bomb, Major’s simple,
               homely style of campaigning did not prevent victory on 9 April and
               may indeed have contributed to it. In the view of some commen-
               tators the ascendancy of John Major as Conservative leader and
               Prime Minister signified a retreat from – or backlash against – the
               sophisticated  image  management  techniques  which  characterised
               British politics in the 1980s. On the other hand, Major’s ‘lack’ of
               image may in itself be read as a careful construction, calculated to
               position him, brand-like, in the political marketplace. While Neil
               Kinnock displayed a slick and glossy self, John Major would be seen
               as the ‘real thing’, unadorned and transparent.
                 In Brendan Bruce’s view, Major’s image comprised the following
               elements:  comparative  youth;  good  looks;  modest  social  back-
               ground;  courteousness;  ‘ordinariness’  and  the  common  touch
               (considered to be an advantage after eleven years of Thatcher). In
               short,  Major  was  all  the  things  which  Mrs  Thatcher  was  not.
               Major’s  image-managers  also  stressed  his  love  of  cricket  (Bruce,
               1992, p. 93). Under the chairmanship of Chris Patten, the Tories’
               public  relations  strategy  was  to  portray  Major  as  representing
               ‘Thatcherism with a human face’. As Patten put it, ‘we are trying to


                                          149
   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175