Page 196 - An Introduction to Political Communication Third Edition
P. 196

PRESSURE-GROUP POLITICS

               the  interests  of  labour  against  those  of  capital.  This  frequently
               brings  unions  into  conflict,  sometimes  of  a  violent  nature,  with
               government and the repressive apparatus of the state. Another form
               of subordinate organisation is the single-issue or pressure group,
               which exists to campaign on a particular issue of special import-
               ance.  The  pressure  group,  too,  will  often  find  itself  confronting
               established power, challenging positions which are dominant. This
               they will typically do from a ‘resource poor’ position, compelling
               them to find ways of participating in and contributing to public
               debate  which  do  not  require  material  or  cultural  ‘capital’.  For
               such  groups,  the  use  and  manipulation  of  the  media  to  com-
               municate political messages is potentially the most effective way of
               achieving this intervention, though even if media access is realised,
               it  imposes  many  limitations  on  the  form  and  content  of  that
               message.
                 Pressure  groups,  unlike  trade  unions,  comprise  more  or  less
               broad cross-class coalitions of individuals, united in their readiness
               to act collectively in pursuit of a limited political objective (some-
               times  around  a  single  issue,  such  as  the  poll  tax  of  the  1980s)
               (Simmons  and  Mechling,  1981).  They  emerge  as  reactions  to
               particular historical conjunctures, and usually decline or disappear
               when these conditions change. Where trade union action focuses on
               various kinds of obstruction of the production process, with the
               media used as a device for communicating to and negotiating with
               a  variety  of  constituencies  (union  membership,  employers,  the
               public,  etc.)  pressure  groups  are  more  concerned  with  symbolic
               demonstrations  of  concern  about,  or  opposition  to,  what  are
               viewed by its members as undesirable social and political trends.
               Thus the international peace movement, which we cite as a case
               study in this section, emerged in the late 1970s and early 1980s as
               a response to what were perceived by many citizens in the US and
               Western Europe as a disturbing deterioration in the NATO–Warsaw
               Pact relationship, and a corresponding increase in the likelihood of
               nuclear war.
                 The ‘nuclear issue’, having been high on the political agenda in
               the 1950s and early 1960s, lay dormant for many years, reflecting
               the period of relatively stable relations between the US and its allies
               and the Soviet Union, which came to be known as détente (McNair,
               1988). With the rise of the radical Right in Britain and the US at
               the end of the 1970s, however, and the expanded military budgets
               and heightened anti-Soviet rhetoric which accompanied that rise,
               the anti-nuclear movement once again began to grow. In Britain, in


                                          175
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201