Page 140 - Analysis and Design of Energy Geostructures
P. 140

the  based  200  12.79  I r ,[ ]  205  290  365  time  rock  joint  for
                       is                                                that  0  radius,
                       r 0  T 50  soil  the  100  8.629  overconsolidation  dissipating  smooth  rock  the  opening  to  equal  grain
                       consolidation,  determine  OCR  4/3  50  5.931  General  0 0.2  the  time.  for  valid  the  is  d rj  account  joint  is  (it  the  is  r g



                       of  to  Tables  and  2.622             is  t 100  the  is  is  and  into  take  rock  geometry  expression,
                       degree  sensitivity  10                coefficient,  t and  planes  acceleration  to  equivalent

                       50%  consolidation.  soil  200  9.292    probe  parallel  equation  surface  the
                       of  the                        Slight over-  consolidation  0.2 0.5  two  joint  In
                       factor  of  S t  100  6.447            correction  CPTU  in  gravitational  (1965)  hydraulic  the  theory.
                       time  degree  (with  1  4.504  OCR,[ ]  1  1  1.5  a  by  theory  the  Campo  the  is  of  concept
                       the  below  50                             flow  is  term  function
                       is  50%                                comprehensive  measured  g  and  a  fractal
                       T 50  of  given  10  2.095     Normal  consolidation  0.5 1.0  fluid  expression,  latter  as
                       where  time  are  A f  200  6.838      the  is  ~ c c  pressure  The  planes.  the  Serafim  the  the  where  opening  the  in

                       C h 5 T 50 r 2 =t 50 ,  0  dissipating  the  coefficient  2/3  100  4.761  High  sensitivity  1.0 1.5  expression,  pore  excess  parallel  In  practice.  in introduced  d e ,  by  the decreases  relation  parameter.




                       by  is  t 50  pressure  50  3.346      the  In  of  value  two  in  in  is  d rj replacing  which  joints).  Kozeny Carman
                       given  test),  water  10  1.593  S t ,[ ]  3 4  2 3  5 6  testing.  the  is  theory  conditions  parameter  by  factor  rock  interconnectivity
                       coefficient  CPTU  a  for  pore  200  5.025  CPTU  Δp w ðtÞ  flow  fluid  rare  are  corrective  done  is  is  f o where  smooth  generalised  the  is


                       consolidation  cm (r 0 5 1:785  Skempton  and  I r  ratio):  1/3  100  3.524  2.487  on  based  consolidation,  from developed  which  flow,  a  which  This  joint.  rock  d e 5 f o d rj ,  totally  for  1  to  from  coming  Γ in and dimension



                       horizontal  probe  of  index  rigidity  overconsolidation  50  10  1.145  Skempton pore water pressure coefficient the  expression  another  of  degree  formula  laminar  with  in expression  the  of  as calculated  and  flow  expression  fractal



                    Comments  the  is  C h  radius  on  A f ,[ ]  I r ,[ ]  [ ]  T 50  I p , [%]  30  22  17  saturated clayey soil  A f ,[ ]  is  This  100%  of  a  is  This  joints  opening.  an  is  This  roughness  be  can  fluid  no  an  is  This  a  is  D f



                                                                               D f 21 1  2n  3Γ 2 ð12nÞ


                                                               t
                    Expression                               γ w r 2 n~ c c  0 Ð t 100 Δp w ðÞdt  0  g  d 2  k 5  rj 12η f  g  d e 2  k 5  12η f     nr 2  g  k 5  8Γ 2  in
                                                              k 5

                 (Continued)  Material                        General  soil  General  rock  Sandstone




                 3.12                                         al.  and  and   al.
                 Table  Reference                             et  Tang  (2011)  Serafim  Campo  (1965)  Serafim  Campo  (1965)  et  Pape  (2000)
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145