Page 203 - Analysis and Design of Energy Geostructures
P. 203

176   Analysis and Design of Energy Geostructures


                in early studies by Melan (1938) and Prager (1949), and it has been employed for the
                analysis of geomaterials such as soils by Drucker et al. (1957), for example.
                   Materials behaving according to the theory of hardening plasticity are characterised
                by a size, location or shape of the yield surface that may change under the develop-
                ment of plastic deformations. In these situations, the yield function depends on the
                stress state and the stress history, and may explicitly depend also on temperature.
                   Materials characterised by hardening and an elastic limit that is assumed to be
                insensitive to temperature (isothermal yield surface) are characterised by the following
                yield function

                                                       ~
                                              f 5 f σ ij ; h i 5 0                    ð4:92Þ
                                               ~
                where σ ij is the relevant stress and h i are the internal variables that define the harden-
                ing. Materials characterised by hardening and an elastic limit that is considered to be
                sensitive to temperature are characterised by the following yield function

                                                     ~
                                             f 5 f σ ij ; h i ; T 5 0                 ð4:93Þ
                   The hardening rule defines the modification of a yield surface during the process
                of plastic flow. In most situations, it is assumed that the shape of the yield surface
                remains unchanged while this surface can change in size, location or both. Reference
                is made to isotropic hardening when upon the development of plastic strains changes in
                size of the yield surface occur but the centre and orientation of the yield surface in the
                stress space remain the same. Reference is made to kinematic hardening when upon the
                development of plastic strains the size of the yield surface remains the same but its
                location changes in the stress space. Reference is made to mixed hardening when the
                size of the yield surface changes upon the development of plastic strains and translates
                in the stress space.
                   When plastic deformation makes the yield surface expanding in size, the material is
                said to have a hardening behaviour, which makes it more difficult to yield. In contrast,
                when plastic deformation makes the yield surface contracting in size, the material is
                said to have a softening behaviour, which makes it easier to yield. Hardening (and soften-
                ing) can be linear or nonlinear.
                   The dependence of plastic deformation of hardening materials on the history of
                the stress state can be appreciated through Fig. 4.21 with reference to the idealised
                stress strain relation characterising a material with a linear elastic behaviour and a
                nonlinear hardening behaviour. Points G and F are characterised by the same state of
                strain but different states of stress.
                   The internal variables that define the hardening are commonly assumed to be a
                function of plastic strains. In these situations, the material is characterised by a strain

                                         ~
                                     ~
                hardening behaviour and h 5 h ε .
                                            p
                                            ij
   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208