Page 126 - Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes, Third Edition
P. 126

Example 3.7



                    For the products A, B, and C in Example 3.3, determine the minimum storage capacities for the single-
                    product campaign strategy outlined in Example 3.3.


                    Solution





                    Table E3.7 shows the results using data given in Example 3.3 and Table 3.1.


                    Table E3.7 Results for the Estimation of Minimum Storage Volume from Equation (3.7)













                    It should be noted that the production cycle time is equal to the sum of the campaign times, or (107.5 +
                    193.5 + 193.5) = 494.5 h, which is slightly less than 500 h. This discrepancy reflects the approximation
                    of cycle times given by Equation (3.6). The actual cycle times for A, B, and C are found from Example
                    3.3 and are equal to 2.63, 4.62, and 4.65 h, respectively. The corresponding values of V  are 7.79, 9.18,
                                                                                                                          s
                                 3
                    and 7.31 m . Clearly, these differences are small, and the approach using Equation (3.6) is acceptable
                    when the number of production runs per campaign is 10 or more.


                    3.5.2 Intermediate Storage





                    Up to this point, it has been assumed that there is no intermediate product storage available. This type of
                    process is also known as a zero wait, or a zw-process [4]. Specifically, as soon as a unit operation is
                    completed,  the  products  are  transferred  to  the  next  unit  operation  in  the  sequence,  or  they  go  to  final
                    product  storage.  The  concept  of  storing  the  final  product  to  match  the  supply  with  the  demand  was
                    demonstrated in Example 3.7. However, it may also be beneficial to store the output from a given piece of
                    equipment for a period of time to increase the overall efficiency of a process. It may be possible to store
                    product in the equipment that has just been used. For example, if two feed streams are mixed in a vessel,
                    the mixture could be stored until the next process unit in the production sequence becomes available. In

                    this case, the storage time is limited based on the scheduling of equipment. This holding-in-place method
                    may not work for some unit operations. For example, in a reactor, a side reaction may take place, and
                    unless the reaction can be quenched, the product yield and selectivity will suffer. The upper limit of the
                    intermediate storage concept occurs when there is unlimited intermediate storage (uis) available, and
                    this  is  referred  to  as  a uis-process  [4].  In  general,  cycle  times  can  be  shortened  when  intermediate
                    product storage is available. This concept is illustrated in Figure 3.7, which is based on the information
                    given in Table 3.2.


                    Figure  3.7  Multiproduct  Sequence  (ABC)  for  Products  Given  in Table  3.2  Showing  Effect  of
   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131