Page 169 - Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes, Third Edition
P. 169

several disincentives that should be considered before final selection:
                          1.   The highest electric utility demand and cost (assuming that the compressor is electrically driven).
                          2.   The highest cooling utility demand and cost.
                          3.   A condition of special concern, that is, T > 400°C (see Table 6.1).
                                    Note:  Compressors  are  high-speed  rotating  devices  where  the  loss  of  material  strength  and
                                thermal expansion is critical. It would be expected that the purchase cost of the compressor
                                would undergo a quantum jump for high-temperature operations.
                          4.   Exceeds the 3:1 pressure ratio provided as a guideline (see Table 6.4).


                    Alternative -B- is more complex than Alternative -A- because it requires an additional heat exchanger,
                    but  it  avoids  the  condition  of  special  concern  in  Item  3.  The  result  of  using  this  extra  exchanger  is  a
                    significant decrease in utilities over Alternative -A-. As a result, it is likely that Alternative -B- would be
                    preferred to Alternative -A-.


                    Alternative  -C-  requires  an  extra  stage  of  compression  and  an  additional  cooler  before  the  second
                    compressor, something that is not required by Alternative -B-. However, Alternative -C- results in an
                    additional savings in utilities over Alternative -B-.


                    The  qualitative  analysis  given  above  suggests  that  both  Alternatives  -B-  and  -C-  are  superior  to
                    Alternative -A-. This conclusion is consistent with the two heuristics for compressors in Table 6.4: It is
                    better to cool a hot gas prior to compressing it, and it is usually desirable to keep the compression ratio

                    less than 3:1. Before a final selection is made, an economic analysis, which must include both the capital
                    investment  and  the  operating  costs,  should  be  carried  out  on  each  of  the  competing  schemes.  The
                    equivalent annual operating cost (EAOC), described in Chapter 10, would be a suitable criterion to make
                    such a comparison.


                    You should review the information given in Table 6.4 and convince yourself that you understand the rules,
                    along with the penalties, remedies, and justifications, for operating equipment under these conditions. You
                    may  also  be  able  to  provide  additional  reasons  why  operating  the  equipment  in  this  way  would  be
                    justified. You  should  add  these  reasons  to  the  list  provided  along  with  additional  heuristics  that  are
                    uncovered as you work problems and gain experience.


                    6.4 Analysis of Important Process Conditions





                    In this section, we begin to analyze and to justify the conditions of special concern found in a process
                    flow diagram. To help with this analysis, it is beneficial to prepare a process conditions matrix (PCM). In
                    the  PCM,  all  the  equipment  is  listed  vertically  and  the  conditions  of  special  concern  are  listed
                    horizontally. Each unit is reviewed for conditions of special concern, and a check mark is used to identify
                    which pieces of equipment have been identified. The PCM for the toluene hydrodealkylation process is
                    shown  in Table 6.5. The information for this PCM was obtained from Chapter 1, and you should verify
                    that none of the areas of special concern have been missed.


                    Table 6.5 Process Conditions Matrix for the PFD of the Toluene Hydrodealklyation Process Shown
                    in Figure 1.5
   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174