Page 59 - Anthropometry, Apparel Sizing and Design
P. 59

Anthropometric methods for apparel design: Body measurement devices and techniques  55

              Though published in 1941 the report of an anthropometric research project by the
           US Department of Agriculture provides a good manual of anthropometry for garment
           design (O’Brien and Shelton, 1941).
              For the quality control of 1-D measurements, ISO 15535 establishes a protocol for
           eliminating irregular values as described in Section 2.4.2. For the quality control of
           scan-derived 1-D measurements, ISO 20685-1 establishes a protocol for evaluating
           comparability with traditional measurements as described in Section 2.3.4. ISO
           20685-2 establishes a protocol for evaluating accuracy of 3-D scanners as described
           in Section 2.3.5.


           References


           Bougourd, J.P., Dekker, L., Ross, P.G., Ward, J.P., 2000. A comparison of women’s sizing by
               3D electronic scanning and traditional anthropometry. J. Text. Inst. 91 (2), 163–173. Part 2.
           Cameron, N., 1984. The Measurement of Human Growth. Croom Helm, London.
           Clauser, C., Tebbetts, I., Bradtmiller, B., McConville, J., Gordon, C.C., 1988. Measurer’s Hand-
               book: US Army anthropometric Survey 1987–1988. Technical Report Natick/TR-88/043,
               United States Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center, Natick, MA.
               01760-5000.
           Daanen, H.A.M., Ter Haar, F.B., 2013. 3D whole body scanners revisited. Displays
               34, 270–275.
           Han, H., Nam, Y., Choi, K., 2010. Comparative analysis of 3D body scan measurements and
               manual measurements of size Korea adult females. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 40, 530–540.
           ISO 15535:2012. General requirements for establishing anthropometric databases.
           ISO 20685-1:2018. 3-D scanning methodologies for internationally compatible anthropometric
               databases—Part 1: Evaluation protocol for body dimensions extracted from 3-D body
               scans.
           ISO 20685-2:2015. 3-D scanning methodologies for internationally compatible anthropometric
               databases—Part 2: Evaluation protocol of surface shape and repeatability of landmark
               positions.
           ISO 7250-1:2017. Basic human body measurements for technological design—Part 1: Body
               measurement definitions and landmarks.
           ISO 8559-1:2017. Size designation of clothes—Part 1: Anthropometric definitions of body
               measurement.
           ISO/TR 7250-2:2010. Basic human body measurements for technological design—Part 2: Sta-
               tistical summaries of body measurements from national populations.
           JIS L 0111:2006. Glossary of terms used in body measurements for cloths.
           Kouchi, M., Mochimaru, M., 2005. Causes of the measurement errors in body dimensions
               derived from 3D body scanners: differences in measurement posture. Anthropol. Sci.
               (Jpn Ser.) 113, 63–75. in Japanese with English abstract.
           Kouchi, M., Mochimaru, M., 2010. Errors in landmarking and the evaluation of the accuracy of
               traditional and 3D anthropometry. Appl. Ergon. 42 (3), 518–527.
           Kouchi, M., Mochimaru, M., Bradtmiller, B., Daanen, H., Li, P., Nacher, B., Nam, Y., 2012.
               A protocol for evaluating the accuracy of 3D body scanners. Work: A J. Prev. Assess.
               Rehabil. 41 (Suppl 1), 4010–4017.
           Lohman, T.G., Roche, A.F., Martorell, R., 1988. Anthropometric Standardization Reference
               Manual. Human Kinetics Books, Champaign, IL.
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64