Page 152 - Applied Probability
P. 152

7. Computation of Mendelian Likelihoods
                              136
                                   new mutation and passes the disease allele to the grandson 7, or the
                                   grandson 7 is a new mutation. The presence of unaffected uncles 5
                                   and 6 and an unaffected brother 8 modifies the probabilities of these
                                   contingencies. Because µ is very small, you may approximate the
                                   probability of a carrier female passing either the normal or disease
                                   allele as 1/2. You may also approximate the prior probability of a
                                   normal female or normal male as 1.)
                                10. Consider a nuclear family in which one parent is affected by an auto-
                                   somal dominant disease [11]. If the affected parent is heterozygous at
                                   a codominant marker locus, the normal parent is homozygous at the
                                   marker locus, and the number of children n ≥ 2, then the family is in-
                                   formative for linkage. Because of the phase ambiguity in the affected
                                   parent, we can split the children of the family into two disjoint sets of
                                   size k and n − k, the first set consisting of recombinant children and
                                   the second set consisting of nonrecombinant children, or vice versa.
                                   Show that the likelihood of the family is
                                                        1  k     n−k   1  n−k      k
                                              L(θ)=      θ (1 − θ)   + θ     (1 − θ) ,
                                                        2              2
                                   where θ is the recombination fraction between the disease and marker
                                   loci. A harder problem is to characterize the maximum of L(θ) on the
                                             1                                   n
                                   interval [0, ]. Without loss of generality, take k ≤  . Then demon-
                                             2                                   2
                                   strate that the likelihood curve is unimodal with maximum at θ =0
                                                                     2
                                                                                         1
                                   when k =0,at θ =   1  when (n − 2k) ≤ n, and at θ ∈ (0, ) oth-
                                                      2                                  2
                                   erwise. (Hints: The case k = 0 can be resolved straightforwardly by

                                   inspecting the derivative L (θ). For the remaining two cases, write

                                   L (θ)= θ k−1 (1 − θ) n−k g(τ), where g(τ) is a polynomial in τ =  θ  .
                                                                                           1−θ
                                   From this representation check that θ = 0 is a local minimum of L(θ)
                                   and that θ =  1  is a stationary point of L(θ). The maximum of L(θ)
                                                2
                                   must therefore occur at θ =  1  or some other positive root of g(τ).
                                                              2
                                   Use Descartes’ rule of signs [7] and symmetry to limit the number of
                                                                                              1
                                                                               1
                                   positive roots of g(τ)on τ ∈ (0, 1], that is, θ ∈ (0, ]. Compute L ( )
                                                                               2             2
                                                                                 1
                                   to determine the nature of the stationary point θ = .)
                                                                                 2
                                11. Consider the revision

                                           L(β)  =      ···     Pen(X i | G i )β  1 {G i =g}
                                                              i
                                                     G 1   G n

                                                    ×    Prior(G j )    Tran(G m | G k ,G l )
                                                       j          {k,l,m}
                                   of the likelihood expression (7.1), where β is an artificial parame-
                                   ter and g is a fixed genotype. Prove that  d  ln L(1) is the expected
                                                                         dβ
                                   number of people in the pedigree with genotype g conditional on the
                                   observed phenotypes in the pedigree. Note that this device is easy to
   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157