Page 147 - Applied Probability
P. 147

1 2            7. Computation of Mendelian Likelihoods  131
                                    Lod Score


                                       0
                                        0.0       0.1       0.2       0.3      0.4       0.5



                                       -1

                                                                Theta

                                FIGURE 7.4. Lod Score Curve for Episodic Ataxia Versus Marker D12S372

                              suggests but does not prove linkage. Note that individual 9004 is a definite
                              recombinant between the disease locus and D12S372; this fact explains the
                              limiting behavior lim θ→0 Z(θ)= −  of the lod score curve. In this example
                                                  1
                              as in all examples, Z( ) = 0 by definition.
                                                  2
                                Once a disease gene is mapped to a particular chromosome region, ge-
                              neticists saturate the region by typing many nearby markers in the disease
                              pedigrees. Because the order and separation of the markers are usually
                              known from the CEPH families, the goal now becomes one of positioning
                              the disease locus on the known marker map. In the method of location
                              scores, we accomplish this task by evaluating and plotting the joint like-
                              lihood of the disease and marker phenotypes as a function of the position
                              of the disease locus [21, 28, 31]. This necessitates converting recombination
                              fractions into map distances, a process we will consider in Chapter 12. For
                              the moment, let us only mention Haldane’s map function
                                                              1
                                                     d   =  − ln(1 − 2θ)                   (7.8)
                                                              2
                              and its inverse
                                                             1     −2d
                                                      θ  =    (1 − e  ),                   (7.9)
                                                             2
                              which is certainly reminiscent of a Poisson process with intensity 2. The
                              map distance d featured in these formulas represents the expected number
                              of crossovers between the two loci per gamete. The unit of distance is the
   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152