Page 186 - Appreciative Leadership
P. 186

The Path of Integrity  159




        belittles them, or even harms them. They hear it in your words and
        the tone of your voice—when you make promises you cannot deliver
        upon. They feel it—when you are short on emotional intelligence,

        avoid conflict, blame others, or express anger inappropriately. When


        you are off the path of integrity, people move away from your ideas,
        your way of working and you. They seek out others whom they can


        respect. When you are off the path of integrity, you become a role
        model for what not to do. People learn and perform in spite of you.
            Integrity refers to a myriad of relational practices. When the
        people we interviewed talked about the presence or absence of
        integrity, they described it with words such as honesty, transpar-
        ency, moral and ethical conduct, speaking truth to power, mak-
        ing and keeping commitments, open communication, congruity
        of words and deeds, reconciliation, forgiveness, and authenticity.
        All these notions point to the idea that integrity means wholeness.
        Appreciative Leadership stays on the path of integrity by making
        choices that serve the whole. Any time your thoughts, words, and
        deeds bring greater wholeness to people and groups, you are on the
        path of integrity. For example, when you help people discover their
        strengths and fulfill their dreams, you are supporting their whole-

        ness. When you include people in conversations and collaborations
        that bridge social divides, you are enhancing organization and com-
        munity wholeness. When you take care of yourself and work to your
        strengths, you are nurturing your own wholeness. And when you
        design sustainability into the processes, products, and services of
        your organization, you are contributing to the integral well-being of
        the whole planet.
            In the early 1990s we were invited to facilitate the design and
        establishment of a global interfaith organization. It was a formidable
        task involving hundreds of religious and spiritual leaders and scholars
        from around the world—most of whom did not know each other. As
        we discussed how we would know we had succeeded, our colleague
        Dr. David Cooperrider suggested that we focus on the quality of con-
        versations and their impact on relationships.
   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191