Page 295 - Artificial Intelligence in the Age of Neural Networks and Brain Computing
P. 295

288    CHAPTER 14 Meaning Versus Information, Prediction Versus Memory




                         question-asking has been employed in interactive problem-solving in robotics [13]
                         and vision problems [14]. However, these are done within a strict task framework;
                         so open-ended questions or questions that question the validity of existing questions
                         cannot be generated (see Ref. [15] for a bit more open-ended approach called inverse
                         Visual Question Answering). For an intelligent agent, this latter form of questioning
                         (or problem-posing) will become increasingly important, as the current learning
                         algorithms cannot easily go beyond its defined task context. Some ideas we dis-
                         cussed in Ref. [10] for problem-posing include: (1) recognizing events in the envi-
                         ronment that can potentially become a problem to be solved, (2) checking if existing
                         problems are ill-posed, and (3) given an overarching goal, come up with smaller
                         problems that may be of different kind than the original goal (if they are of the
                         same kind, straight-forward, divide-and-conquer algorithms can be used).
                            How can the idea of question versus answer be relevant to brain science? I think
                         it is relevant since the topic has not received attention that it deserves, and question
                         asking (or problem-posing) is an important function of the brain. There are many
                         papers on decision making, but not much on how the brain asks questions that
                         requires subsequent decision making. Understanding the brain mechanism of
                         question-asking can lead to new discoveries regarding core brain function, and in
                         turn the insight can help us build better intelligent artifacts.
                            In sum, question-asking needs more attention from brain science and artificial
                         intelligence, in order for us to gain a deeper understanding of brain function and
                         to build more intelligent artifacts.



                         5. DISCUSSION

                         In this chapter, I talked about several dichotomies of concepts that are important to
                         brain science and artificial intelligence: meaning versus information, prediction
                         versus memory, and question versus answer, with an emphasis on the first concept
                         in each pair. Below, I will discuss additional related works that have relevance to
                         the topics I discussed in the preceding sections.
                            In terms of meaning, deep neural network research approaches the issue from a
                         different angle than the one presented in this chapterdthat of embedding, for
                         example, word and sentence embedding [16]. The main idea of embedding is to
                         map words or sentences (or other raw input) into a vector space where concepts
                         can be manipulated algebraically based on their meaning. For example, when vector
                         representations of “Germany” and “capital” are added, the resulting vector repre-
                         sents “Berlin” (example from Ref. [16]). The main idea in this case is to train a
                         neural network to map the input word to a series of words that appear before or after
                         the input word in a sentence. The hidden layer representation then tends to have this
                         desired semantic property. This is one step toward meaningful information. However,
                         whether the meaning in this case is intrinsic to the system, that is, interpretable from
                         within the system, is an open question.
   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300