Page 201 - Assurance of Sterility for Sensitive Combination Products and Materials
P. 201

Risk to the patient—Quantifying assurance of sterility   181


              Table 7.5  Packaging tests most commonly used to for performance qualification.
              Purpose          Test            Output          Typical Result
              Integrity testing   Visual inspection  Channel   None found
                of porous                        dimensions
                packaging      Dye penetration  Channel        None found
                                                 dimensions
                               Bubble test     Bubbles/no      None found
                                                 bubbles
              Microbial barrier   Microbial Ingress  Pass/fail  All pass
                test methods
              Seal Strength    Tensile peel    Force           Variable result



              has been exposed to mechanical and thermal stresses that might damage
              the seals. Damage to the seals could compromise the sterile barrier. These
              inspections are often done using one or more of the methods shown in
              Table 7.5. While it is possible that some of these methods could generate
              continuously variable data for statistical analysis, the acceptance criteria and
              the result are “none,” that is, zero defects found in the sample size that was
              reviewed.
                 Table 7.3 for nonparametric analysis shows the sample sizes associated
              with sampling plans where the acceptance criterion is “none found.” These
              are historically common “c equals zero” acceptance sampling plans, where
              the lower case c is the acceptance number. By definition, the point estimate
                                                                             −9
              of zero acceptance number plans is zero. A zero PNSU*, shown as 1 × 10
                                                    −6
              in Fig. 7.4, implies a lower risk than a 1 × 10  PNSU*.
                 Table 7.3 shows that the confidence bounds associated with these point
              estimates vary with sample size. A performance qualification that required
              the testing of three batches of 30 results in 90 total samples. Assuming this
              testing is accepted, the UCB of the PNSU* would fall in the middle of the
                −2
                                                                     −2
              10  range in Table 7.3. The exact value of the bound is 3.3 × 10 . Sample
                                                                     −4
              sizes in the tens of thousands would result in an UCB in the 10  range.
                 ISO standard 11607-2 does not specify sample sizes or acceptance cri-
              terion. It requires three batches and it requires that the sampling (sample
              sizes) be based on statistically valid rationale. Sample sizes of 30 and 3000
              are shown in Fig. 7.4.
                 The point estimate of PNSU* for packaging scenarios in Fig. 7.4 is
                              −9
              zero (plotted at 10 ) as ISO 11607 requires no defects found. While the
                                                                      −3
              sample size of 3000 shown in Fig. 7.4 provides an UCB of 10 , typical
                                                                      −1
                                                      −3
              sample sizes result in an UCB higher than 10 , for example, 10  for the
   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206