Page 33 - Assurance of Sterility for Sensitive Combination Products and Materials
P. 33

Sensitive combination products   21


              if not developed with the appropriate attention to the chemistry (Fig. 2.4).
              Solutions must therefore be sought, especially as it is predicted that ad-
              vances in bioresorbable implant technologies will drive further combina-
              tion product market expansion in the near future. Notable is the acquisition
              of TYRX Inc. by Medtronic in early 2014. With a recently FDA cleared
              AIGISRx combination product based on a resorbable antibacterial enve-
              lope to reduce surgical site infections associated with cardiac implantable
              electronic devices, AIGISRx R antibacterial envelope for use with spinal
              cord stimulators, and Pivitab antibiotic impregnated resorbable hernia mesh
              in development, Medtronic have signaled a clear investment in bioabsorb-
              able polymer technologies.
                 And where is all of this heading? The most likely scenario is an
                ever-increasing degree of product functionality and complexity. A new class
              of combination products known as ‘Multipurpose Prevention Technologies
              (MPTs)’ [19] are under development that are gels, intravaginal rings (IVRs),
              or barrier devices used with a gel or film that have a combination of con-
              traceptive, microbiocidal, and/or anti-sexually transmitted infection (STI)
              properties with different mechanisms of action that act to prevent pregnancy,
              HIV, and/or STIs. For example, novel IVRs that combine  contraceptive
              hormones (e.g., Levonorgestrol) with Tenofovir, a drug shown to prevent
              both HIV and HSV-2 are being developed. This is just one example of a
              combination product in which two or more different drug types are com-
              bined with a single delivery device in order to address multiple therapeutic
              indications where targeted locoregional delivery from the device makes
              sense. Obviously, attention to drug-drug interactions will be important
              consideration for such products, but again, one of the biggest challenges in
              their development process will be the identification of an appropriate route
              to sterilization that maintains individual component integrity.



              References
                [1]  A.L.  Lewis, M.R.  Dreher, Locoregional drug delivery using image-guided intra-
                 arterial drug eluting bead therapy, J. Control. Release 161 (2) (2012) 338–350.
                [2]  A.L. Lewis, R.R. Holden, DC bead embolic drug-eluting bead: clinical application in
                 the locoregional treatment of tumours, Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 8 (2) (2011) 153–169.
                [3]  A.L. Lewis, et al., DC bead: In vitro characterization of a drug-delivery device for
                 transarterial chemoembolization, J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 17 (2) (2006) 335–342. Pt 1.
                [4]  S. Baltes, et al., Doxorubicin and irinotecan drug-eluting beads for treatment of glioma:
                 a pilot study in a rat model, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 21 (4) (2010) 1393–1402.
                [5]  S. Glage, et al., Evaluation of biocompatibility and anti-glioma efficacy of doxorubicin
                 and irinotecan drug-eluting bead suspensions in alginate, Clin. Transl. Oncol. 14 (1)
                 (2012) 50–59.
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38