Page 71 - Automotive Engineering Powertrain Chassis System and Vehicle Body
P. 71

CH AP TER 3 .1       Emissions control

               have placed limits on the total output of both NO x and  but also on the rate of rise and fall to and from it. Sec-
               HC, instead of on each separately, leaving manufacturers  ondly, the combustion temperatures depend on primarily
               free to obtain the best compromise between the two.  the quantity and, to a lesser degree, the cetane number of
                 The problem of emission control, however, is not so  the fuel injected.
               severe as might be inferred from the last paragraph. Both  Increasing the cetane number reduces the delay
               NO x output and heat toexhaust become significantonly as  period, so the fuel starts to bum earlier, so higher tem-
               maximum torque and power are approached. At lighter  peratures and therefore more NO x are generated while
               loads, the gases tend to be cooled because of both their  the burning gas is still being compressed (Fig. 3.1-21).
               excess air content and the large expansion ratio of the  However, a smaller quantity of fuel is injected before
               diesel engine. Since the proportion of excess air falls as the  combustion begins, and this, by reducing the amount of
               load increases, oxidising catalysts can be used without risk  fuel burning at around TDC, reduces the peak combus-
               of overheating, even at maximum power output.      tion temperature. The net result of the two effects is
                 Fuel blending and quality have a profound effect on  relatively little or even no change in NO x output. An
               emissions. Since fuel properties and qualities are  interesting feature in Fig. 3.1-22 is the enormous dif-
               interrelated, it is generally unsatisfactory to vary one  ference between the NO x outputs from direct and in-
               property unilaterally. Indeed, efforts to reduce one ex-  direct injection systems.
               haust pollutant can increase others and adversely affect  The popular concept that increasing fuel volatility
               other properties.                                  reduces NO x is an illusion: what happens in reality is that
                                                                  the weight of fuel injected is reduced, and the engine is
                                                                  therefore de-rated. Consequently, combustion tempera-
               3.1.20 Oxides of nitrogen, NO           x          tures are lowered. This is explained in more detail in
                                                                  Section 3.1.26, in connection with black smoke.
               To understand the effects of fuel properties on NO x  In the early 1990s, the overall output of NO x from the
               output certain basic facts must be borne in mind. First, it  diesel engine was, on average, between 5 and 10 times
               depends not only on the peak temperature of combustion  that of an equivalent gasoline power unit with a catalytic










































               Fig. 3.1-21 (Left) Tests by BP showing how injection timing influences combustion and therefore NO x output; (right) the influence of
               cetane number on the principal emissions.


                    68
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76