Page 270 - Autonomous Mobile Robots
P. 270

256                                    Autonomous Mobile Robots

                                                          n
                                            n−m
                                   As λ ∈ L ∞   and µ ∈ L , from Equation (6.27), it is obvious that
                                                          ∞
                                      n
                                                                      n
                                 ˙ µ ∈ L . Thus, from (6.31), we have ˙ν ∈ L . Since ˙z, ¨z ∈ L m  have been
                                      ∞                              ∞              ∞
                                                                                   n
                                established before, we can conclude from (6.32) that ˙σ ∈ L . Now, with
                                                                                   ∞
                                        n
                                                n
                                σ, µ ∈ L , ˙σ, ˙µ ∈ L , according to Lemma 6.3, we can conclude that σ and µ
                                       2        ∞
                                asymptotically converge to zero. Hence, from (6.28), it can be concluded that
                                s → 0as t →∞. According to Lemma 6.3, we can also obtain e z , ˙e z → 0
                                as t →∞.
                                                n
                                   Since ˙q, ¨q ∈ L , q and ˙q are uniformly continuous. Therefore, from
                                                ∞
                                Property 6.1, we can conclude that matrices M(q), C(q, ˙q), G(q), S(q), J(q),
                                D(q), C(q, ˙q), and G(q) are uniformly continuous.
                                      ˆ
                                 ˆ
                                                ˆ
                                Remark 6.5  If Bτ is directly replaced by (6.34) in the dynamic equation (6.1)
                                without considering the real implementation issue, a wrong conclusion may be
                                drawn.
                                   Substituting (6.34) and (6.47) to (6.49) into the dynamic equation (6.33)
                                yields the closed-loop system error equation as
                                                   T
                                                                ∗ T
                                               ˆ
                                                       ˆ
                                  M ˙σ + Cσ = ([{W M } •{S M }]−[{W } •{S M }])˙ν
                                                                M
                                                                  ∗ T
                                                    T
                                                        ˆ
                                                 ˆ
                                            + ([{W C } •{S C }]−[{W } •{S C }])ν
                                                                  C
                                                    T
                                                                  ∗ T
                                                 ˆ
                                                        ˆ
                                            + ([{W G } •{S G }]−[{W } •{S G }])
                                                                  G
                                                            T
                                            − K σ σ + (1 + k λ )J e λ − E − K s sgn(σ)
                                                  n  n              n  n              n

                                               ˆ                 ˆ                 ˆ
                                            − b m       ¯ φ m ij  |σ i ˙ν j |− b c  ¯ φ c ij  |σ i ν j |− b g  ¯ φ g i  |σ i |
                                                 i=1 j=1           i=1 j=1           i=1
                                                                                          (6.86)
                                which is misleading as it seems there is control effort applied to force error
                                e λ and the wrong conclusion of asymptotic convergence of e λ may be drawn.
                                                                            T T
                                This is due to the ignorance of the inherent property R J = 0. Thus, for the
                                proposed scheme in this chapter, one can only guarantee the boundedness of
                                e λ , which will be confirmed in the simulation study.
                                6.5 SIMULATION STUDIES
                                Consideramobilerobot moving on ahorizontalplane, driven by two rearwheels
                                mounted on the same axis, and having one front passive wheel. The dynamic


                                 © 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC



                                FRANKL: “dk6033_c006” — 2006/3/31 — 16:42 — page 256 — #28
   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275