Page 166 - Basic Well Log Analysis for Geologist
P. 166

LOG  INTERPRETATION  CASE  STUDIES






         Case  Study  2
         Mississippian  Mission  Canyon  Formation

         Williston  Basin

          An  Ordovician  Red  River  wildcat  well  is  in  progress  in   Canyon  Porosity  zone  (Fig.  66).  Consequently,  you  decide
        the  Williston  basin.  As  drilling  proceeds,  two  zones—the   to  begin  your  evaluation  of  the  Mission  Canyon  by
        Mississippian  Mission  Canyon  and  Devonian             developing  a  Pickett  crossplot  which  will  give  you  a  quick
        Duperow-—are  encountered  which  have  hydrocarbon       analysis  of  the  distribution  of  the  different  water
        shows.  The  well  has  just  penetrated  the  Devonian  Duperow,   saturations,  Values  from  the  log  (Fig.  62)  for  neutron
        the  second  “show”  zone.  A  decision  is  made  to  stop  and   porosity  (,)  and  from  the  log  (Fig.  61)  for  deep  resistivity
        drill  stem  test  (DST)  the  Duperow.  Unfortunately,  the  drill   (R,..*),  when  crossplotted  on  two-by-three  cycle  log-log
        stem  test  tool  fails  and  becomes  firmly  stuck.  Several   paper,  will  show  these  water  saturation  distributions.
        attempts  are  made  to  remove  the  tool  but  none  succeed.   In  order  to  establish  an  R,  line  in  the  Pickett  crossplot.
        Meanwhile,  wall  collapse  (caving)  begins  to  develop  within   you  use  the  following  information:
        the  well  bore.
                                                                                     R,  =Ry,  x  F
          Now  you  face  the  choice  of  either  halting  drilling  with  the
        hope  that  the  first  show  zone,  the  Mississippian  Mission   Where  10%  porosity,  F  =  1/2  or  100
        Canyon  Formation,  might  be  a  productive  reservoir  or,  of
                                                                                   R,  =  0.023  x  100
        continuing  efforts  to  remove  the  DST  tool.  If  the  fish  (the
        stuck  DST  tool)  ts  successfully  removed  from  the  hole,  the   or
        Duperow  can  be  tested  and  drilling  continued  to  the  Red
                                                                                  R,  =  2.3  ohm/meters
        River  Formation.  However,  continued  attempts  to  recover              G
        the  fish  will  undoubtedly  lead  to  further  deterioration  of  the   The  slope  of  the  R,  line  equals  2  (average  slope  for
        hole,  and  logging  measurements  taken  when  hole      carbonates).
        conditions  are  poor,  may  be  unreliable.  Also,  it  is  possible   Choose  any  five  points  (depths)  in  the  following  Mission
        the  DST  teol  cannot  be  dislodged.                    Canyon  Log  Evaluation  Table  (work  Table  B)  and  calculate
          Because  of  the  exploratory  nature  of  the  well,  you  made  a   the  values  for  the  blank  spaces  (complete  the  Table  for  those
        decision  several  weeks  ago  to  core  the  Mission  Canyon  at  a   five  depths).
        depth  of  9.302  to  9,358  ft.  Twenty-five  feet  of oil-stained,   After  determining  values  for  the  different  Jog  parameters,
        fractured.  microcrystalline  dolomite  was  recovered,  and  the   you  can  use  the  formula  for  volumetric  calculation  of
        remaining  core  consisted  of  microcrystalline  limestone  and   recoverable  oil  to  evaluate  the  productive  potential  of  the
        anhydrite.  After  coring.  se  eral  DST’s  were  tried  and  when   Mississippian  Mission  Canyon  Formation.  The  formula  for
        nene  were  successful,  the  well  was  drilled  ahead.   volumetric  calculation  of  recoverable  oil  ts:
          You  decide  the  information  from  coring  is  favorable
                                                                               7758  x  DA  x  h&  @  *  Sy  X RF
        enough  to  halt  drilling,  to  log  to  the  top of  the  fish  while
                                                                          ut               BOI
        hole  conditions  appear  still  reasonably  good,  and  then  to
        assess  the  potential  of  the  Mission  Canyon.  Your  company   Parameters  used  in  your  calculations  of  recoverable  oil  are:
        agrees  with  your  suggestion  that  a  very  complete  log   drainage  area  (DA)  =  150-acres;  reservoir  thickness  (h)  =
        package  be  run  in  the  hole,  since  the  well  is  exploratory  and   28  ft:  porosity  ()  =  11%:  water  saturation  (S,,)  =  33.5%;
        carbonates  can  often  be  harder  to  evaluate  than  sandstones.   recovery  factor  =  20%;  and  reservoir  barrels  per  stock  tank
          The  following  data  are  available  to  you:  (1)  resistivity  of   barrel  (BOI)  =  1.35.  When  the  equation  is  solved  for  N,
        the  formation  water  (Ry)  at  Ty  =  0.023;  (2)  resistivity  of  the   the  resulting  value  for  N,  represents  stock  tank  barrels.  A
        higher  water  saturations  in  the  lower  part  of  the  Mission      Evaluation  Table  (work  Table  B)  has  already  been  partly
                                                                  stock  tank  barrel  is  oil  recovered  at  the  surface  after
        mud  filtrate  (R,,-)  at  T;  =  0.017;  (3)  temperature  of  the
                                                                  shrinkage  has  occurred  as  gas  separates.
        formation  (T,)  =  207°F;  (4)  At,  =  44.4  wsec/ft,  which  is
                                                                    The  Mississippian  Mission  Canyon  Formation  Log
        the  interval  transit  time  for  a  dolomite  matrix  (Table  6);  (5)
        At,  =  185  yesec/ft,  which  is  the  interval  transit  time of fluid
                                                                  completed  for  you.  Fill  in  the  rest  of  the  table  as  you
        for  saltwater  mud  (Chapter  IV);  (6)  pmy  =  2.82  gm/ce,
                                                                   proceed  with  your  calculations.
        which  is  the  matrix  density  for  dolomite  (Table  7):  (7)  pp  =
         1.1  gm/cc.  which  is  the  fluid  density  for  saltwater  mud
        (Chapter  IV);  and  (8)  the  surface  temperature  =  60°F.
          Preliminary  examination  of a Cyberlook*  Log  reveals
   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171