Page 279 - Battleground The Media Volume 1 and 2
P. 279

  |  Med a Watch Groups

                       claiming a budget five times the size of its older peer. Project Censored’s use of
                       students to perform much of its work has kept it going strong despite limited
                       funds. FAIR, an early pacesetter, has in some respects, such as its $800,000 annual
                       budget, been eclipsed in the increasingly crowded field on the left by Media Mat-
                       ters’s deepened pockets ($6 million annual budget) and the rise of Free Press from
                       a project of the Media Education Foundation to an independent and influential
                       organization with a $5 million annual budget, raised mostly from foundations.
                       Other foundation-supported media watch groups include the Institute for Pub-
                       lic Accuracy, led by Norman Solomon, and the Media Alliance, which supports
                       political action and other activities beyond critique. The Center for Media and
                       Democracy, which sponsors PR Watch, Sourcewatch, and Congresspedia, spends
                       about a half-million dollars a year, most of it from a long list of foundations, and
                       gets a good deal of bang for its buck by dominating criticism of the influential
                       public relations industry. Also dominating its media watch sector is the Adbusters
                       Media Foundation, which publishes the 120,000-circulation “culture-jamming”
                       Adbusters  magazine,  operates  a  Web  site,  and  runs  PowerShift,  an  advocacy
                       advertising agency. Diversified approaches to economic survival can be found in
                       the model of Media Channel, produced by Globalvision New Media, a project
                       of the Global Center. Fledgling media organizations can use the Global Center
                       Foundation as a fiscal sponsor by paying it an administrative fee, keeping open a
                       door for still more media watch and activism organizations to join the field.
                          Locally focused media watch efforts in the United States appear to have a
                       more difficult time staying afloat. Grade the News (GTN), an award-winning
                       media watch site focused on the San Francisco Bay Area, had to curtail its activi-
                       ties with the lapse of a Knight Foundation grant, just as the region’s journalistic
                       quality absorbed a major blow with the takeover of almost all of its newspapers
                       by the budget- and staff-cutting Medianews Group. GTN’s methods, utilizing
                       metrics such as column inches; numbers of seconds devoted to broadcast sto-
                       ries; source diversity; and story impact estimates, generate grades for newscasts
                       and newspapers. As incubators of novel media watching praxis, locally based
                       enterprises offer many interesting models that may take root if they survive their
                       beta stages. Retro Poll, also based in the Bay Area, uses students and volunteers
                       to survey randomly generated national samples, measuring responses to opinion
                       questions against answers to factual questions about news, to show that people
                       relying on certain news sources have an inferior grasp of documented facts, cor-
                       relating with distinct opinion responses at odds with what has in some quarters
                       been referred to as “the reality-based community.” News Trust, which allows its
                       readers to rate stories, and applies measures to rate and weight the value of the
                       raters and the ratings, offers a model for media watching that invites scalable
                       applications with potential value for prospective news consumers and produc-
                       ers alike. As Web 2.0 generates new interactive methods of surveillance of and
                       feedback to news producers, the world of media watching is likely to evolve in
                       diverse and unpredictable directions, but the struggle for funding will continue
                       to mute the effects of most such enterprises.
                          Hope springs eternal for the prospects of a media watcher breaking through
                       to broader consciousness through the viral characteristics of the Internet, but
   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284