Page 280 - Battleground The Media Volume 1 and 2
P. 280

Med a Watch Groups  | 

              there is little hope for the sector as a newsstand financial proposition. In print,
              CJR and AJR survive on reputation and a mix of funding, and trade publications
              such as Editor & Publisher continue to perform media watch functions, mostly
              for industry audiences. The high-profile bust of Brill’s Content, a glossy media
              criticism magazine that briefly achieved a circulation of more than 325,000 but
              never made money and folded not long after reducing its frequency from 10 an-
              nual issues to 4, provides a cautionary tale for anyone hoping for an expanded
              audience  for  journalism  critique.  Brill’s  Content,  which  attracted  advertising
              befitting an anticipated high-end readership, did bid to engage a broader seg-
              ment of the public in holding media to account, but its financial failure demon-
              strated that media watch entrepreneurship has its limits, and that the consumer
              market alone will likely not sustain such a scale of activity. The issue of advertis-
              ing revenue to support critical journals also poses a particularly difficult prob-
              lem in an age when commercial ad buyers have demonstrated their willingness
              to exert significant influence over media content, making challenging indepen-
              dent analysis all that more difficult to disseminate to a broad public.


                ThE FuTurE oF mEDia waTChing

                One of the simplest and most direct models of media criticism to emerge has
              come from another old media format: television. When Jon Stewart plays back
              the self-contradicting statements of politicians and juxtaposes official absurdities
              against common sense, using visual evidence, along with the obligatory look of
              exaggerated befuddlement, he and the producers of The Daily Show on Comedy
              Central advance media criticism to a stage many consider long overdue. Fans of
              The Daily Show and loyal members of The Colbert Report’s “Colbert Nation” in
              effect become part of a media watch community that not only calls to account
              those in power as mainstream media seldom have, but ignites in a difficult-to-
              reach demographic an actual interest in the news, even as trends show declining
              newspaper readership and news awareness among young people.
                Meanwhile, much media critique will, of course, remain trenchant and con-
              tinue to be a main feature of alternative media and publications, even as it finds
              its way into more mainstream venues such as Comedy Central. The growth of
              Internet  bloggers  able  to  disseminate  almost  instantaneous  comments  about
              news  stories,  reporters,  errors,  exaggerations,  and  outrages  in  a  media  envi-
              ronment ripe with such fare guarantees the continuation and growth of media
              watching.
              see also Alternative Media in the United States; Bias and Objectivity; Blogo-
              sphere;  Conglomeration  and  Media  Monopolies;  Global  Community  Media;
              Hypercommercialism; Media Literacy; Media Reform; News Satire; Public Ac-
              cess Television; Public Broadcasting Service; Sensationalism, Fear Mongering
              and Tabloid Media; User-Created Content and Audience Participation.
              Further reading: Alterman, Eric. What Liberal Media? The Truth About Bias and the News.
                 New York: Basic Books, 2003; Bagdikian, Ben. The New Media Monopoly. Boston: Beacon
                 Press, 2004; Bennett, W. Lance. News: The Politics of Illusion. New York: Longman, 2004;
   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285