Page 122 - Becoming Metric Wise
P. 122

113
                                                    Publication and Citation Analysis

              •  One’s other colleagues; more precisely colleagues studying the same
                 topics and sharing the same research interests (other theoretical
                 informetricians).
              •  One’s larger membership group, such as a professional society
                 (ASIS&T, ISSI).
              •  The research field at large (all information scientists).
              •  All scientists and the culture in which one is embedded (one may
                 occasionally cite a Nobelist, a well-known writer or philosopher, an
                 editor of a journal which is totally outside one’s own field).
                 We note that recitation may also occur within one article, but such
              synchronous recitation is not what was studied by White (2000, 2001).
              Recitation within one article can be used to weight received citations
              (Rousseau, 1987).


              5.6 DIFFICULTIES RELATED TO COUNTING
              5.6.1 Problems Related to Publication and Citation Counts
              (Egghe & Rousseau, 1990)
              We provide a list of problems or difficulties occurring when counting
              publications or citations. Some of these problems are related to providing
              correct credits to actors.
              •  Self-citations, of authors, journals, countries, .. . This point is dis-
                 cussed in the next subsection.
              •  How to assign credits in the case of multiauthored articles. Also this
                 point is discussed further on.
              •  Homonyms (different persons with the same name). Many persons
                 with the same full name, or with the same name and initials happen
                 to work in the same field or at the same university. To differentiate
                 between them additional information is necessary, such as a complete
                 publication list, detailed institutional affiliation, or names of (frequent)
                 coauthors. This problem is especially large in Eastern countries
                 (China, Japan, Korea) (Cornell, 1982) and India. A solution for this
                 problem consists of providing a persistent digital identifier that distin-
                 guishes a scientist from each other colleague. At the moment the best
                 known author    identifier is ORCID (Open Researcher and
                 Contributor ID; available at https://orcid.org/), which consists of 16
                 characters. It provides a persistent identity to humans, similar to the
                 way a digital object identifier uniquely identifies a digitally accessible
                 object. Clarivate Analytics’ ResearcherID can be considered (although
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127