Page 227 - Becoming Metric Wise
P. 227

218   Becoming Metric-Wise


          Table 7.6 Calculation of a g-index
          Rank   Publication (date)  # citations  Cumulative number  Squared
                                              of citations      rank
          1       A (2010)        8            8                 1
          2       B (2013)        5           13                 4
          3      C (2011)         5           18                 9
          4      D (2011)         4           22                16
          5       E (2008)        4           26                25
          6       F (2014)        1           27                36
          7      G (2010)         0           27                49


             An example. We consider again Table 7.2 and add the information
          necessary to determine its g-index, see Table 7.6.
                                                             2
             As the articles ranked 1 to 5 have together at least 5 5 25 citations,
                                                                     2
          namely 26, and the articles ranked 1 to 6 have strictly less than 6 5 36
          citations (they have 27 citations), this set has a g-index equal to 5.
             The use of a square in this definition is inspired by the fact that a set
                                                     2
          with h-index h has received together at least h citations. Consider for
          instance [4, 4, 4, 4, 0, 0]. This set has h-index 4; the total number of cita-
          tions is 16 and its g-index is also 4. From this it also follows that for a
          given set, we have g $ h.
             As for the h-index one may say that the first g articles form the
          g-core, again ranking in antichronological order if need be.
             What happens if a list of T articles has together strictly more than T 2
          citations? This is illustrated in Table 7.7. In this case one adds “fictitious”
          articles with zero citations until the g-index can be calculated. The fact
          that it is not bounded by the number of publications can be considered
          an advantage of the g-index (Gla ¨nzel, 2006).
             Before discussing a few other h-type indices we consider the question:
          Which one of the two, the h-index or the g-index, is the best one?
          Egghe being the originator of the g-index naturally prefers the g-index.
          However, we leave it to the readers to make up their mind, or to decide
          whether this is a meaningless question. Either way, here are two examples,
          illustrating two opposite cases:
             X 1 5 [15, 10, 5, 3] and X 2 5 [3,3,3,0,0,0] have the same h-index,
          namely 3, but different g-indices: g(X 1 ) 5 5 while g(X 2 ) 5 3.
             Consider now Y 1 5 [60,4,0,0,0,0] and Y 2 5 [15,15,12,12,8,7,7,3,1].
          These scientists have the same g-index: g(Y 1 ) 5 g(Y 2 ) 5 8, but different
          h-indices: h(Y 1 ) 5 2 and h(Y 2 ) 5 7.
   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232