Page 203 - Encyclopedia Of World History Vol IV
P. 203

1504 berkshire encyclopedia of world history












            marked by a rejection of traditional social, religious, and  agency of human beings.With many of its creators them-
            political ideas and an emphasis on rationalism] thought,  selves migrants to the “First World,” it is not surprising
            science, the modern state, and colonial knowledge) have  that postcolonial analyses are particularly interested in
            shaped our world, engendering dangerous stereotypes,  the dynamics by which social identities based on class,
            misrepresentations, and inequalities.Writers have given  caste, gender, nationality, ethnicity, race, and sexuality
            special attention to questions of religious conversion,  are informed and unsettled by global phenomena such
            Western science and education, travel writing, literature,  as capitalism, colonialism, migration, and international
            and nationalism.                                    politics. Postcolonial writers frequently engage in self-
              Postcolonial analysis is a valuable addition to the rep-  criticism, or auto-critique, and so postcolonial narratives
            ertoire of approaches being used by world historians to  can seem to break up no sooner than they take shape.
            conceptualize global flows, processes, and connections  Nevertheless, postcolonial analysis has contributed
            across time. It has provided world historians with a  significantly to the study of world history by cautioning
            repertoire of tools for analysis drawn from feminist stud-  against the development of simplistic macro (large-scale,
            ies, literary criticism, Marxism, philosophy, and psycho-  general) frameworks and categories that usually end up
            analysis. Postcolonial analysts study global phenomena  losing sight of the variety of historical actors and the
            such as imperialism, colonialism, decolonization, capital-  nuances that make up global processes. World history
            ism, world systems, nationalism, and migration not only  practiced in this vein becomes theoretically sophisti-
            in terms of neatly bounded nations, culture regions, civ-  cated, thematically focused, and self-critical, its dominant
            ilizations, time periods, and abstract processes but also  narratives and grand theories constantly breaking down
            in terms of complex flows that embrace a wide range of  to reveal the world full of differences, contradictions, and
            actors across societies and time periods. The advent of  variations. Although we cannot yet see the full impact of
            subaltern studies approaches has impressed on world  these trends in world history, postcolonial analysis con-
            historians the need to critique structures of power and  tinues to offer one of the most exciting frameworks for
            social inequalities and to recognize the presence of dis-  cultural study and will invigorate the study of world his-
            empowered and subordinated groups (women, indige-   tory for some time to come.
            nous peoples, peasants, tribals, low castes, gays and les-
                                                                                               Bernardo A. Michael
            bians) throughout the history of the world. Recent
            postcolonial writers have taken a philosophical turn in  See also Colonialism, Decolonization
            their attempt to critique the very discipline of history—
            especially its intellectual debts to Western thought.These
                                                                                    Further Reading
            writers seek to include alternative understandings of the
                                                                Ahmad, A. (1992). In theory: Classes, nations, literatures. London:
            world that do not conform to the standards of Western
                                                                  Verso.
            reason or modern disciplinary conventions.          Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (Eds.). (1998). Key concepts in
                                                                  postcolonial studies. London: Routledge.
                                                                Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
            Implications                                        Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and
            Yet, this focus on complexity and agency in the study of  historical difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
                                                                Chatterjee, P. (1993). The nation and its fragments: Colonial and post-
            historical processes has not always transitioned neatly to
                                                                  colonial histories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
            the study of large-scale processes. Perhaps what distin-  Dirlik, A. (1997). The postcolonial aura:Third World criticism in the age
            guishes postcolonial analysis from other forms of writing  of global capitalism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
                                                                Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmak-
            in world history is its reluctance to produce grand theo-  ing of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
            ries or analyze large-scale processes and instead to focus  Gandhi, L. (1998). Postcolonial theory:A critical introduction. New York:
                                                                  Columbia University Press.
            more on specific texts and historical situations con-
                                                                Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness.
            cerned with the politics of identity formation and the  Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208