Page 294 - Between One and Many The Art and Science of Public Speaking
P. 294

Chapter 10  Language: Making Verbal Sense of the Message             261



                    credibility with the audience and create a high degree of mutual understand-
                    ing. There are a number of guidelines to follow in this process. The fi rst rule
                    is to choose language appropriate to the rhetorical situation. The second rule
                    concerns choosing language that makes every member of our audience feel in-
                    cluded in our message. This is known as inclusive language, as opposed to mar-
                    ginalizing or totalizing language, concepts we will explain shortly. The third
                    rule concerns choosing language that will enhance rather than undermine au-
                                                                                     3
                    dience perceptions of our competence and trustworthiness as a speaker.  The
                    fourth rule concerns using language to its fullest potential to involve our au-
                    dience in the speech. The fi fth rule focuses on using language that will help
                    us manage our speech, and help our audience understand what we want to
                    communicate.


                    Use Language Appropriate
                    to the Rhetorical Situation


                    The language of a speech needs to refl ect the overall rhetorical situation we
                    face, not just audience members. In addition to being appropriate to audience
                    diversity, language also should be appropriate to the context in which we fi nd
                    ourselves. We’ve learned that we can face the same or similar audience in very
                    different contexts. For example, we have given speeches honoring a retiring col-
                    league to an audience that also has listened to us argue in a speech that a policy
                    proposed by the university administration should be rejected. Although the au-
                    dience was the same, our rhetoric, in style and in substance, was different.
                      Along the same lines, language should refl ect the purpose of a speech and
                    the goal we hope to achieve. An informative speech demonstrating how to read
                    a company’s annual report requires language very different from a persuasive
                    speech advocating the replacement of the company’s Board of Directors.
                                                                                             inclusive language
                                                                                             Language that helps
                    Use Inclusive Language                                                   people believe that they
                                                                                             not only have a stake
                    The next rule in choosing the words of a speech is to use language that is inclu-  in matters of societal
                    sive. Inclusive language helps people believe that they not only have a stake   importance but also have
                    in matters of societal importance but also have power in this regard. Inclusive   power in this regard.
                    language doesn’t leave people out of the picture because of their gender, race,
                                                                                             marginalizing
                    ethnicity, age, religion, sexual orientation, or ability. Put another way, inclusive
                                                                                             language
                    language doesn’t marginalize people.
                                                                                             Language that diminishes
                      Marginalizing language diminishes people’s importance and makes
                                                                                             people’s importance and

                    them appear to be less powerful, less significant, and less worthwhile than they   makes them appear to
                    are. Marginalizing language also appeals to biases audience members may hold   be less powerful, less
                    consciously or subconsciously.                                           signifi cant, and less
                      At the same time, inclusive language doesn’t totalize people.          worthwhile than they are.
                      Totalizing language defi nes people on the basis of a single attribute, such
                    as race, ethnicity, biological sex, or disability. In a speech, the following state-  totalizing language
                    ments would exemplify totalizing:                                        Language that defi nes
                                                                                             people exclusively on the
                       “The dyslexics in this audience . . .”                                basis of a single attribute,
                                                                                             such as race, ethnicity,
                       “As a woman, you’ve got to learn to assert yourself.”
                                                                                             biological sex, or ability.
                       “As a victim of racism . . .”
   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299