Page 133 - Beyond Decommissioning
P. 133

114                                                Beyond Decommissioning

         The case is different though at chemical sites, which are closely integrated and where
         decommissioning of a part of the site interferes with operation of the rest of the site
         (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2006).
            Restricted use entails reliance upon institutional control. Such control can consist
         of warnings against trespassing and/or fencing (Fig. 2.11). Administrative measures
         can impose planning restrictions at local or national level. The applicability and effi-
         ciency of controls vary from country to country, depending on traditions, to what
         extent competent authorities enforce rules, and the economic conditions of the coun-
         try. In several cases scarcity of land, political turmoil, or broken communications have
         caused reoccupation of contaminated land. Redevelopment alternatives counting on
         institutional control need to be assessed pragmatically (International Atomic
         Energy Agency, 2002).
            A related environmental point is the environmental impact from the demolition of
         old buildings and facilities; this includes airborne particulates (e.g., contaminated dust)
         and noxious gases, noise, and occupational and public risk (e.g., falling loads, unex-
         pected structural collapse). Several cases of botched explosions have been reported
         where a building did not collapse as planned: to complete demolition, workers had
         to reenter the partly damaged building—a dangerous activity indeed—and, recover
         unexploded charges, place more explosives. By contrast, environmental contamination
         and public inconvenience caused by demolition will be prevented by adaptive reuse.
            Finally, a note about greyfield, a term coined in the early 2000s. Greyfield land
         (or just greyfield) is economically obsolescent, outdated, moribund, or underused
         land. “Greyfield” is a relative new term as compared to brownfield or greenfield.
         The term has been typically used for formerly viable commercial sites (such as
         regional malls and outlets) that have been little upgraded and have been surpassed
         by larger, better designed, or more conveniently located sites of a similar nature.
         Typically shopping malls have been replaced by lifestyle centers, which combine
         the traditional retail functions with leisure amenities oriented toward upscale con-
         sumers. In many cases, buildings left at greyfields are just empty shells.
            Unlike brownfields, which include real or suspected levels of environmental con-
         tamination, greyfields do not require remediation to attract an investor. Their value
         often resides in underlying infrastructure (such as plumbing and sewerage, electrical
         systems, foundations, parking, etc.), or a central location, which allows the investor to
         better the site and makes it more profitable. For the purposes of this book greyfields
         offer little new to discuss compared to either greenfields or brownfields, therefore no
         further mention will be made of this category.


         5.6   Long-term site mission

         The site being redeveloped may have been associated for decades to a specified indus-
         trial mission, for example, R&D or electricity generation. This has involved the estab-
         lishment of a dedicated infrastructure (be it public or privately owned), which can
         justify the continued use of the site for similar activities, perhaps with adaptations
         to changed circumstances. However, recognition that the long-term mission of a site
   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138