Page 202 - Biaxial Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture
P. 202

186                          T LAGODA ET AL.


               For distinguishing the positive and negative work in a fatigue cycle, we introduced functions
             sgn[e(t)]  and  sgn[a(t)J  in  Eq. (3).  Then,  during  a  tension  half-period,  the  sign  of  work
             0.25 &(t)o(t) sgn[e(t)] is determined by the strain sign and during a compression half-cycle the
             sign of work 0.25 &(t)o(t) sgn[o(t)] is influenced by the stress sign.
               Let us introduce the two-argument logical function sgn(x, y), sensitive to signs of variables
             x and y, defined as follows
                          ‘1    when  sgn(x) = sgn(y) = 1
                          0.5   when  x=O  and  sgn(y)=l   or  y=O  and  sgn(x)=l
                 sgn(x, y) =.  0   when  sgn(x) =-sgn(y)                         (5a)
                          -0.5  when  x=O  and  sgn(y)=-1  or  y=O  and  sgn(x)=-l
                          ,- 1   when  sgn(x) = sgn(y) = -1

             When sgn(x, y) = 0.5 or -0.5  according to Eq. (5a), then always W(t) = 0 according to Eq. (4).
             Thus, Eq. (5) can be written in a simplified way
                              ‘1   when  sgn(x) = sgn(y) = 1


                     sgn(x, y) =  0   when


                              <-  1  when  sgn(x) = sgn(y) = -1
                                                                                 (5b)

             Then Eq. (4) can be written as follows




               Let us notice that Eq. (6) expresses the positive and negative parameter of strain energy den-
             sity in a fatigue cycle and it allows to distinguish energy (specific work) under tension and un-
             der compression. Expression (6) has another advantage: the parameter of  strain energy history
             has the zero mean value, while cyclic stress and strain change symmetrically in relation to the
             zero levels. If  we do not introduce the sign of  stress and strain under cyclic loading, the fre-
             quency of the strain energy history W(t) would increase twice, the amplitudes would decrease
             twice and the mean value would be different from zero. It is not acceptable because it leads to
             counting of a greater number of fatigue cycles with smaller amplitudes [20].
               Under cyclic loading, if stress and strain reach their maximum values Ga  and &, the maxi-
             mum parameter of strain energy density, Eq. (6) and its amplitude are equal to

                                           W,  =0.5~,&, .                        (7)

               Figure 1 shows interpretations of amplitude of the strain energy density parameter. Assum-
             ing W(t) according to Eq. (6) as the damage parameter, we can replace the standard character-
             istics of cyclic fatigue (0, - Nf) and (& - Nf) by a new one, (W, - Nf). In the case of the high-
             cycle fatigue, when the characteristic (0, - Nf) is used, the axis 0,  should be replaced by W,,
             where
   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207