Page 220 - Biaxial Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture
P. 220

204                         A.  YARVANI-FARAHANI

            incremental plasticity theory to predict fatigue life under complex non-proportional multiaxial
            loading conditions  [6], however the approach did  not successfully correlate the uniaxial and
            torsional fatigue data. In another attempt [7-81, a ratio of axial strain to maximum shear strain
            has been introduced as a correction factor to the energy approach. This ratio has been criticized
            because the hysteresis energy method used in Refs [7-81 does not hold any terms to reflect this
            strain ratio.
              Fatigue  analysis  using  the  concept  of  a  critical  plane  of  maximum  shear  strain  is  very
            effective  because  the  critical plane  concept is based on  the  fracture mode or the  initiation
            mechanism of cracks. In the critical plane concept, after determining the maximum shear strain
            plane,  many  researchers  have defined fatigue parameters as combinations of  the maximum
            shear strain (or stress) and normal strain (or stress) on that plane to explain multiaxial fatigue
            behavior  [9-131. Some researchers [ 14-18] used the energy criterion in conjunction with  the
            critical  plane  approach. Energy-critical plane parameters are defined on  specific planes  and
            account for  states of  stress through combinations of  the  normal and  shear strain and  stress
             ranges. These parameters depend upon the choice of the critical plane and the stress and strain
            ranges acting on that plane.  For instance, Liu [14] calculated the virtual strain energy (WE) in
            the critical plane by the use of crack initiation modes. The critical plane in Liu’s parameter is
            associated with two different physical modes of failure and the parameter consists of Mode I
            and Mode 11 energy components. The Mode I energy is computed by first identifying the plane
             on  which the axial energy is maximized and adding the shear energy on that plane. Similarly,
             the Mode II energy is calculated by  first identifying the plane on  which the  shear energy is
             maximized  and  then  adding  the  axial  energy  component.  In  the  calculation  of  VSE,  Liu
             induced both elastic energy and plastic energy while the elastic energy was not considered in
             Garud’s model [6].  Chu et al. [ 151 formulated normal and shear energy components based on
             Smith-Watson-Topper parameter. They determined the critical plane and the largest damage
             parameter  from  the  transformation  of  strains  and  stresses  onto  planes  spaced  at  equal
             increments using a generalized Mroz model [19]. Glinka et ai. [I61 presented a multiaxial life
             parameter based on the summation of the products of shear and normal strains and stresses on
             the critical shear plane.
               In a recent study [ 171, a multiaxial fatigue parameter for various in-phase and out-of-phase
             loading  paths  has  been  proposed. The parameter is  given by  the  integration of  the  normal
             energy range and the shear energy range calculated for the critical plane at which the stress and
             strain Mohr’s circles are the largest during the reversals of a cycle. The maximum shear strains
             for in-phase and out-of-phase paths are numerically calculated at small increments through a
             fatigue cycle. The parameter has taken into account both elastic and plastic strain components
             in  fatigue  damage  analysis.  The  normal  and  shear  energies  in  this  parameter  have  been
             weighted by  the tensile and shear fatigue properties, respectively, and the parameter requires
             no  empirical  fitting factors. The parameter has taken  into account the effect of  mean  stress
             applied normal to the critical plane and has also shown an  increase when there is additional
             hardening,  caused  by  out-of-phase  loading, while  strain-based parameters fail  to  take  into
             account this effect. The present paper further extends the Varvani’s damage parameter [ 171 for
             fatigue life assessment under biaxial loading condition by accumulating damage on a cycle-by-
             cycle basis within an entire two-axis block loading history, where the stress-time axes are at
             different frequencies.


             MATERIAL AND FATIGUE TESTS
             Table 1 tabulates the chemical composition and fatigue properties of EN 24 steel studied in the
             present paper.
   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225