Page 368 - Biaxial Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture
P. 368

352                 c. CAL~ R. CITARELLA AND M. PERRELLA

            and attain a value of   [16]. At the end, high resolution accuracy at the comer may not be
            worth pursuing, in any  case, because the geometry  where the crack intersects the surface is
            expected to adjust under loading so as to ameliorate the stronger singularity [ 171.


             The incremental direction. The crack growth direction and SIF equivalent are computed by the
            minimum strain energy density criterion. The criterion for three dimensional problems can be
            found  in [18]. The explicit expression of strain energy density around the crack front can be
            written as:

                                   dW     s(0) +0(1)
                                   -=-
                                    dV   r.cosq5

             where S(8) is given by
                        S(0) = a,, - K: + 2a,, - K, K, + a22 Ki + aY3 . Ki!
                                                                                (9)

             and

                                  a,, = -.  1   (3 - 4v - cos@). (1 + COSO)
                                       16rp
                                          1
                                     aI2 = - -sine. (cos0 - 1 + 4v)
                                         8v
                           a22 = -.  1   [4(1-  v) (1 - cos@) + (3 cos 0 - 1). (1 + cos 011
                                1 6n,





             in  which  pstands  for  the  shear  modulus  of  elasticity  and  v  is  the  Poisson  ratio.  S/cos(
             represents the amplitude of intensity of the strain energy density field and it varies with the
             angle 4 and 0. It is apparent that the minimum of S/cosb always occurs in the normal plane of
             the  crack front curve, namely  +=O.  S is known as strain energy density factor and  plays a
             similar role to the stress intensity factor.
               The theory is based on three hypotheses:
             1.  The direction of the crack growth at any point along the crack  front is toward the region
                with the minimum value of strain energy density factor S as compared with other regions on
                the same spherical surface surrounding the point.
             2.  Crack extension occurs when the strain energy density factor in the region determined by
                hypothesis  S = &in,  reaches a critical value, say SCr.
             3.  The length, r,, of the initial crack extension is assumed to be proportional to Sm,, such that
                Smi,,/r0 remains constant along the new crack front.
             It can be seen that the minimum strain energy density criterion can be used both in two and
             three dimensions. Note that the direction evaluated by the criterion in three dimensional cases is
             insensitive to KII~. The crack growth direction angle 8, is obtained by  minimising the strain
             energy density factor S(8) 6f Eq.(9) with respect to 8. The minimum strain density factor S(0,)
   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373