Page 483 - Biaxial Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture
P. 483

Fatigue Assessment of Mechanical Components Under Complex Multiaxial hading   467


            In  order  to  handle  non-proportional  loading  effect  on  fatigue  resistance,  many  new
          methodologies have been  developed and  are based  on  various concepts such as the  critical
          plane approach [5], integral approach [6], mesoscopic scale approach [7], etc.
            A common feature of many high-cycle multiaxial fatigue criteria is that they are expressed
          as a  general form  and  include both  shear stress amplitude  r,  and normal  stress  u during a
          loading cycle:
                                         T, + k(N)o= R(N)                      (1)

          where k(N) and  h(N) are  material  parameters for  a  given  cyclic  life N. Multiaxial  fatigue
          models differ in the interpretation of  how shear stress and normal stress terms in Eq.  (1)  are
          defined.
            For non-proportional cases, a stress-based version of  the ASME boiler and pressure vessel
          code, case N-47-23 [8], may be used as an  extension of  the von Mises criterion, in which an
          equivalent stress amplitude parameter, SEQA, is defined from stress ranges Abx, Aby, Abz, Arxy,
          Azyz.  AT^,, in the form

                       I
                  ScQa =xJAc,   -Ae,)2  +(ACT, -Aci)2  +(Aci -Ac,)'  +6(Arm2   AT,:^ +AT,')   (2)
          where Ao,=o,(t,)-o,(tz),  Ao,=o,(t,)-o,(tz), etc. SEQA is maximized with  respect to two time
          instants, 11  and t2, during a fatigue loading cycle.
            For constant amplitude bending and torsional stresses such as




          Eq.(2) becomes

                                                              9
                                          3
                                                 +:
                               S,   =%/I  +  K2 +,/I  I(  cos(2Sx,) + - K  .   (4)
                                                              16
          where K=2ztla,.
            When r,/ob=0.5 and 6,,=0   (proportional loading case), Eq. (4) gives  S,,  = 1.3230,.  When
          z,/ob=0.5 and F,,=90"  (out-of-phase loading case), Eq. (4) gives  S,,   = bh, which means that
          out-of-phase load case is predicted to be less damaging than the proportional load case with the
          Same stress amplitudes.
            However, experimental results showed that the prediction by Eq. (4) for out-of-phase load
          case is inconsistent and non-conservative. Hitherto, many approaches have been proposed for
          treating the non-proportional effects, among them the critical plane approach and the integral
          approach are two important concepts.


          Critical Plane Approaches

          Critical plane approaches are based upon  the physical observation that fatigue cracks initiate
          and grow on certain material planes. The orientation of the critical plane is commonly defined
          as the plane with maximum shear stress amplitude. The linear combination of  the shear stress
   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488