Page 179 - Bio Engineering Approaches to Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
P. 179

References    177
































                  FIGURE 7.11  MDCs penetration depth in the presence of 2 T external magnet (porosity = 0.3,
                  z = 5 mm).

                     As shown, in the absence of external magnet, the rate of the penetration depth
                  decreases excessively as time passes. This is because the gradient of MDCs concen-
                  tration which causes the diffusion decreases as time passes. However, the presence of
                  external magnet causes the penetration depth of MDCs to increase constantly. This is
                  because the magnetic term of MDCs penetration does not decrease with time.



                  References
                  [1] M. Ghassemi, A. Shahidian, Nano and Bio Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Academic Press,
                     (2017).
                  [2] Q.A. Pankhurst, J. Connolly, S.K. Jones, J. Dobson, Applications of magnetic nanopar-
                     ticles in biomedicine, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 (13) (2003) R167.
                  [3] P.J. Cregg, K. Murphy, A. Mardinoglu, Calculation of nanoparticle capture efficiency in
                     magnetic drug targeting, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320 (23) (2008) 3272–3275.
                  [4] D.K. Rajan, J. Lekkala, Coercivity Weighted Langevin Magnetisation; A New Approach
                     to Interpret Superparamagnetic and Nonsuperparamagnetic Behaviour in Single Domain
                     Magnetic Nanoparticles, 2013, arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.2517.
                  [5] M.R. Habibi, Numerical Study of Magnetic Nano-Particles in Blood Flow Under Non-Uni-
                     form Magnetic Field (Ph.D. Dissertation), K.N. Toosi Universiyu of Technology, Iran, 2012.
                  [6] A. Weddemann, I. Ennen, A. Regtmeier, C. Albon, A. Wolff, K. Eckstädt, et al. Review
                     and outlook: from single nanoparticles to self-assembled monolayers and granular GMR
                     sensors, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 1 (1) (2010) 75–93.
   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184